...
首页> 外文期刊>Earth and Planetary Science Letters: A Letter Journal Devoted to the Development in Time of the Earth and Planetary System >Moon, Mars, Mercury: Basin formation ages and implications for the maximum surface age and the migration of gaseous planets
【24h】

Moon, Mars, Mercury: Basin formation ages and implications for the maximum surface age and the migration of gaseous planets

机译:月球,火星,水星:盆地形成年龄及其对最大地表年龄和气态行星迁移的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Basin formation ages for Moon, Mars and Mercury are determined by cratering statistics, compared and evaluated with respect to their maximum surface ages and available isotope ages, and two possible Solar System evolution models. Both Mars and Mercury appear to have undergone significant resurfacing, so that at least the first 200-400 million years are not recorded on their surfaces. Basin frequency and crater frequencies below 150 km indicate that the Moon has the oldest surface, Mercury has an intermediate age, and Mars has the youngest preserved terrain. An offset between the basin size-frequency distribution, the smaller crater size-frequency distribution and the main belt asteroid size-frequency distribution is observed in all three cases, suggesting an age difference of about 150 Ma between basin and smaller crater distribution-based ages. I interpreted this in terms of lack of understanding of the basin formation process, and suggest that one possible explanation for the apparently under-representative basin frequency could be a different (lower) average impact velocity compatible with the 'Nice' flux model. The basin formation pattern derived with the standard monotonically decaying or the sawtooth-like Nice-model flux does not reveal a coherent picture according to the late heavy bombardment idea. This is here attributed to an incomplete understanding of the cratering rate ratios between the planetary bodies considered here. Because of the Moon's unique formation history, I also suggest that it is questionable whether the Moon is a suitable analogue for the formation, evolution and cratering record of the other terrestrial bodies. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:月球,火星和水星的盆地形成年龄由陨石坑统计确定,并根据其最大地表年龄和可用同位素年龄以及两个可能的太阳系演化模型进行比较和评估。火星和水星似乎都进行了重修,因此至少没有记录前200-400亿年的表面。流域频率和低于150 km的火山口频率表明,月球表面最古老,水星年龄适中,火星保存的地形最年轻。在这三种情况下都观察到盆地大小-频率分布,较小的陨石坑大小-频率分布和主带小行星大小-频率分布之间的偏移,表明盆地和较小的陨石坑基于年龄的年龄之间的年龄差约为150 Ma。 。我是根据对盆地形成过程缺乏了解的方式来解释这一点的,并建议对表面上代表性不足的盆地频率的一种可能解释可能是与“ Nice”通量模型兼容的不同(较低)平均撞击速度。根据后期重磅轰炸的想法,用标准的单调衰减或类似锯齿状的尼斯模型通量得出的盆地形成模式没有揭示出连贯的图景。这归因于对此处考虑的行星体之间的缩孔率比的不完全理解。由于月球具有独特的形成历史,因此我还提出一个疑问,即月球是否适合作为其他地面物体的形成,演化和陨石坑记录的类似物。 (C)2014 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号