...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological restoration >U.S. Wetland Protection and Restoration: Have We Made a Difference?
【24h】

U.S. Wetland Protection and Restoration: Have We Made a Difference?

机译:美国湿地保护与恢复:我们有所作为吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Wetlands alteration is not unique to the United States. Humans all over the world have filled them for agriculture, industry, and housing and dredged them for marinas, ports, and harbors (Mitsch and Gosselink 2007). We have restricted the flow of water (and the sediment it carries) and piped the water elsewhere. We continue to alter wetlands, but the pace in the United States has slowed in large part due to state and federal wetlands protection regulations. Having destroyed up to 80% of wetlands in some states such as Ohio, where wetlands were drained for agriculture, we are now moving to enhance those with compromised function and restore those that were lost (Kusler and Kentula 1990, USEPA 2001). Most of our enhancement and restoration has occurred since 1980. The question is this: Have we made a difference in the amount of wetlands or in the rates of loss or restoration.
机译:湿地改变不是美国独有的。全世界的人类已经将它们填满了用于农业,工业和住房,并疏them了它们的码头,港口和港口(Mitsch and Gosselink 2007)。我们限制了水(及其携带的沉积物)的流动,并将水通过管道输送到其他地方。我们继续改变湿地,但由于州和联邦对湿地的保护规定,美国的步伐在很大程度上已放缓。我们已经破坏了俄亥俄州等一些州80%的湿地,那里的湿地被排干用于农业生产,我们现在正着手增强功能受损的湿地并恢复失去的湿地(Kusler和Kentula 1990,USEPA 2001)。自1980年以来,我们大部分的改善和恢复工作都在进行。问题是:我们在湿地的数量或损失或恢复的速度上有所不同吗?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号