【24h】

Vesta and extensively melted asteroids: Why HED meteorites are probably not from Vesta

机译:维斯塔(Vesta)和广泛融化的小行星:为什么HED陨石可能并非来自维斯塔(Vesta)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Most researchers hold that the HED clan of differentiated meteorites originated on Vesta largely based on the assumption that nearly all V-type asteroids with basaltic reflection spectra are fragments spalled off Vesta. Although it is a reasonable working hypothesis that most of the V-type asteroids in the Vesta family originated on Vesta, the spectra are not unique enough to confirm this; a sizable fraction may have been produced during the destruction of a differentiated asteroid in the same large region of dynamic space. Observations of asteroids in the inner Asteroid Belt show that more than half of the V-type asteroids do not belong to the Vesta dynamic family.Iron-meteorite evidence shows that at least 26 asteroids experienced extensive melting and would have generated basalts and other differentiated stony meteorites. Most iron meteorites show high degrees of elemental fractionations that lead to the conclusion that they experienced fractional crystallization; it is probable that all these bodies generated basalts. There are 9 of these "magmatic" iron-meteorite groups and test criteria mainly based on extreme fractionations indicate that an additional 17 disrupted asteroids hosted fractionally crystallized cores and thus that ≥26 asteroids experienced extensive melting; this estimate is much lower than previous estimates that included nonmagmatic irons.Within expected planetary heterogeneities the O-isotopic composition of HEDs is the same as that in oxides from IIIAB irons, the largest magmatic group of iron meteorites. εCr54 values are also very similar in IIIABs and HEDs. The O- and Cr-isotopic ties are much stronger than the spectral tie thus the working hypothesis should be that HEDs are from the IIIAB parent asteroid.Remote elemental analysis could confirm that HEDs are not from Vesta. If future remote analysis measures K contents ≥0.6 mg/g this will indicate that HEDs did not originate on Vesta.
机译:大多数研究人员认为,分化的陨石的HED族起源于Vesta,主要基于这样的假设:几乎所有具有玄武岩反射光谱的V型小行星都是从Vesta剥落的碎片。尽管有一个合理的假设,即维斯塔家族中的大多数V型小行星起源于维斯塔,但光谱的独特性不足以证实这一点。在相同的动态空间大区域中,在分化小行星的破坏过程中可能产生了相当大的分数。在内部小行星带的小行星观测表明,超过一半的V型小行星不属于Vesta动力族。铁陨石证据表明,至少有26个小行星经历了广泛的融化并会生成玄武岩和其他分化的石质陨石。多数铁陨石显示出高度的元素分馏,从而得出结论:它们经历了分步结晶。所有这些物体很可能产生玄武岩。这些“岩浆”铁陨石中有9个,主要基于极端分馏的测试标准表明,另外有17个破裂的小行星拥有分形的结晶核,因此,≥26个小行星经历了广泛的融化。在预期的行星异质性内,HED的O同位素组成与IIIAB铁(最大的铁陨石岩浆组)的氧化物中的O-同位素组成相同。在IIIAB和HED中,εCr54值也非常相似。 O-和Cr-同位素键比光谱键强得多,因此工作假设应该是HED来自IIIAB母体小行星。远程元素分析可以证实HED不是来自Vesta。如果将来的远程分析测得的K含量≥0.6mg / g,则表明HED并非起源于Vesta。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号