...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological engineering: The Journal of Ecotechnology >Evaluation of common evapotranspiration models based on measurements from two extensive green roofs in New York City
【24h】

Evaluation of common evapotranspiration models based on measurements from two extensive green roofs in New York City

机译:基于纽约市两个大面积绿色屋顶的测量值对常见蒸散模型的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although the evapotranspiration (ET) process has historically received limited attention, it is an important factor for assessing the health and behavior of urban green spaces, including green roofs. In this study, common potential evapotranspiration (PET) models, which assume non-water-limited substrate moisture conditions, and actual evapotranspiration (AET) models, which account for water-limited substrate moisture conditions, are used to predict ET from local climate conditions at two extensive Sedum green roof sites in New York City (NYC); one a vegetated mat system (termed W118) and the other a built in place system (termed USPS). Results from the predictions are compared to 12,000 h of on-site ET measurements obtained using a dynamic chamber system. Among the Hargreaves, Priestley-Taylor, Penman, and American Society of Civil Engineers Penman-Monteith PET models, results from the Priestley-Taylor model, which was developed to predict ET from a wet vegetated surface with minimal advection, best correlate with the dynamic chamber measurements (r-squared = 0.96 for W118, 0.82 for USPS). Nonetheless, a systematic error is seen whereby the Priestley-Taylor model overestimates the low ET fluxes observed during the winter months and underestimates the high ET fluxes observed during the summer months. This error is only exaggerated by the inclusion of an advective ET term. To estimate green roof ET under water-limited conditions, a storage model, antecedent precipitation index (API), and advection-aridity model are applied to the Priestley-Taylor formulation to calculate AET. Results indicate that only the API model, which is based on precipitation history alone, can improve upon the Priestley-Taylor PET predictions (r-squared = 0.96 on W118, 0.85 on USPS). Use of a more-physically based, substrate moisture storage greatly over-estimates ET reduction during dry periods. The work provides insight into which common ET models best capture the behavior of full-scale, extensive green roofs, and points to the need for better estimates of green roof ET under climate conditions typical of NYC's winter and summer months. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:尽管蒸散发(ET)过程历来受到的关注很少,但它是评估包括屋顶绿化带在内的城市绿色空间的健康和行为的重要因素。在这项研究中,使用常见的潜在蒸散量(PET)模型(假设非水分受限的基质水分条件)和实际蒸发量(AET)模型(考虑水分受限的基质水分条件),根据当地气候条件预测ET在纽约市(NYC)的两个广阔的Sedum绿屋顶站点上;一个是植被垫系统(称为W118),另一个是内置系统(称为USPS)。将预测结果与使用动态腔室系统获得的12,000小时现场ET测量值进行比较。在Hargreaves,Priestley-Taylor,Penman和美国土木工程师协会Penman-Monteith PET模型中,Priestley-Taylor模型的结果被开发出来,用于预测湿润植被表面的ET,对流程度最小,与动态关系最佳。腔室测量(对于W118,r平方= 0.96,对于USPS,r-平方= 0.82)。尽管如此,仍存在系统误差,Priestley-Taylor模型高估了冬季月份观测到的低ET通量,而低估了夏季月份观测到的高ET通量。仅通过包含对流ET术语会夸大此错误。为了估算在缺水条件下的绿色屋顶ET,将存储模型,先前降水指数(API)和对流干旱模型应用于Priestley-Taylor公式以计算AET。结果表明,仅基于降水历史的API模型才能改善Priestley-Taylor PET的预测(W118的r平方= 0.96,USPS的r-平方= 0.85)。使用基于物理的基材水分存储大大高估了干燥时期的ET减少量。这项工作提供了哪些常见的ET模型最好地捕获了全尺寸,大面积绿色屋顶行为的见解,并指出了需要在纽约冬季和夏季典型的气候条件下更好地估计绿色屋顶ET的需求。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号