...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Applications >Bird assemblage response to restoration of fire-suppressed longleaf pine sandhills
【24h】

Bird assemblage response to restoration of fire-suppressed longleaf pine sandhills

机译:鸟类组合对火抑制的长叶松树沙丘恢复的响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The ecological restoration of fire-suppressed habitats may require a multifaceted approach. Removal of hardwood trees together with reintroduction of fire has been suggested as a method of restoring fire-suppressed longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) forests; however, this strategy, although widespread, has not been evaluated on large spatial and temporal scales. We used a landscape-scale experimental design to examine how bird assemblages in fire-suppressed longleaf pine sandhills responded to fire alone or fire following mechanical removal or herbicide application to reduce hardwood levels. Individual treatments were compared to fire-suppressed controls and reference sites. After initial treatment, all sites were managed with prescribed fire, on an approximately two- to three-year interval, for over a decade. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling ordinations suggested that avian assemblages on sites that experienced any form of hardwood removal differed from assemblages on both firesuppressed sites and reference sites 3-4 years after treatment (i.e., early posttreatment). After >10 years of prescribed burning on all sites (i.e., late posttreatment), only assemblages at sites treated with herbicide were indistinguishable from assemblages at reference sites. By the end of the study, individual species that were once indicators of reference sites no longer contributed to making reference sites unique. Occupancy modeling of these indicator species also demonstrated increasing similarity across treatments over time. Overall, although we documented long-term and variable assemblage-level change, our results indicate occupancy for birds considered longleaf pine specialists was similar at treatment and reference sites after over a decade of prescribed burning, regardless of initial method of hardwood removal. In other words, based on the response of species highly associated with the habitat, we found no justification for the added cost and effort of fire surrogates; fire alone was sufficient to restore these species.
机译:防火住所的生态恢复可能需要采取多方面的方法。有人建议去除阔叶树并重新引入火种,作为恢复受火抑制的长叶松(Pinus palustris)森林的一种方法。然而,这种策略虽然广泛,但尚未在大的时空尺度上进行评估。我们使用了景观规模的实验设计,研究了受火抑制的长叶松树沙丘中的鸟类组合对单独火灾或机械清除或施用除草剂以降低硬木水平后的火灾的反应。将个体治疗与抑制火灾的对照和参考部位进行比较。经过初步治疗后,所有场所均按规定的火势进行管理,间隔约两年至三年,持续了十多年。非度量多维缩放比例标准表明,处理后3-4年(即早期的早期处理),经历过任何形式的硬木去除的鸟类鸟类群与经过防火抑制的鸟类和参考种群的鸟类群均不同。在所有地点进行规定的焚烧> 10年后(即后期后期处理),只有用除草剂处理过的地点的组合物与参考位置的组合物没有区别。到研究结束时,曾经作为参考位点指标的单个物种不再有助于使参考位点变得独特。这些指示剂种类的占用模型还表明,随着时间的推移,各处理之间的相似性不断提高。总体而言,尽管我们记录了长期且可变的组合水平变化,但我们的结果表明,经过十多年的规定燃烧后,无论采用何种硬木清除方法,被认为是长叶松树专家的鸟类在治疗点和参考点的占用率均相似。换句话说,根据与栖息地高度相关的物种的反应,我们没有理由证明替代灭火剂会增加成本和精力。单靠火就足以恢复这些物种。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号