首页> 外文期刊>Econometrica >The democratic political economy of progressive income taxation
【24h】

The democratic political economy of progressive income taxation

机译:累进所得税的民主政治经济学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Why do both left and right political parties typically propose progressive income taxation schemes in political competition? Analysis of this problem has been hindered by the two-dimensionality of the issue space. To give parties a choice over a domain that contains both progressive and regressive income tax policies requires an issue space that is at least two-dimensional. Nash equilibrium in pure strategies of the standard two-party game, whose players have complete preferences over a two-dimensional policy space, generically fails to exist. I introduce a new equilibrium concept for political games, based on the fact of factional conflict within parties. Each party is supposed to consist of reformists, militants, and opportunists: each faction has a complete preference order on policy space, but together they can only agree on a partial order. Nash equilibria of the two-party game, where the policy space consists of all quadratic income tax functions, and each party is represented by its partial order, exist, and it is shown that, in such equilibria, both parties propose progressive income taxation.
机译:为什么左右的政党通常都会在政治竞争中提出累进所得税计划?问题空间的二维性阻碍了对此问题的分析。要让各方在同时包含累进和累进所得税政策的域中进行选择,需要发行空间至少为二维的。通常,标准两方博弈的纯策略中不存在纳什均衡,这种均衡的参与者对二维策略空间具有完全的偏好。我基于政党内部派系冲突的事实,为政治游戏引入了新的均衡概念。每个政党都应该由改良主义者,激进分子和机会主义者组成:每个派别在政策空间上都有完整的优先顺序,但是他们在一起只能达成部分顺序。存在两方博弈的纳什均衡,其中政策空间由所有二次所得税函数组成,并且每一方都由其偏序表示,并且证明了在这种均衡中,双方都提出了累进所得税。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号