...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Applications >Consequences of human-altered floods: Levees, floods, and floodplain forests along the Wisconsin River
【24h】

Consequences of human-altered floods: Levees, floods, and floodplain forests along the Wisconsin River

机译:人为改变的洪水的后果:威斯康星河沿岸的堤防,洪水和漫滩森林

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Flood-control levees are generally thought to increase flood height and velocity for a given discharge. While extensive areas of floodplain in the United States are leveed, the ecological impacts of levees have largely been ignored relative to other anthropogenic impacts to large river floodplains. We examined a century of flood control along the Wisconsin River by comparing simulated flood regimes under "levee" and "levee-removal" scenarios. We also used field sampling to determine if levees had altered the distribution of dominant floodplain forest trees. Increases in flood stage (height) due to levees were minor, only a few centimeters. This was primarily due to the location of the levees, set back hundreds of meters into the floodplain in some areas. Increases in overbank flood velocities due to levees were minimal compared to increases caused by channel constriction and by increased flood magnitude. Generally, levees had a greater impact on stage and overbank flood velocities of larger magnitude events. The mean number of floods and number of days flooded were lower in areas outside (on upland sides) of levees, and stream power was zero in these areas due to a lack of any inundation. These areas also had lower importance values (IV) for several flood-tolerant tree species (Acer saccharinum and Fraxinus pennsylvanica) and higher IVs for some flood-intolerant species (Quercus velutina and Q. ellipsoidalis). Furthermore, areas inside levees (between the levee land the channel) were no different from completely unleveed areas in the number of floods, number of days, flooded and in INS of several dominant tree species. The levee location (set back into the floodplain) resulted in a similar historic flood regime, and thus, similar abundances of floodplain tree species in areas inside levees as compared to completely unleveed areas. Setback levees can provide an important compromise by maintaining the relative abundance of tree species normally found in unleveed areas, while also allowing some flood control. Floodplain restoration involving levee removal should generally target the removal of mainline levees (those adjacent to the channel) rather than removal of setback levees. [References: 85]
机译:一般认为,防洪堤对于给定的流量会增加洪水的高度和速度。尽管美国泛滥平原泛滥,但与其他人为因素对大河泛滥平原的影响相比,堤防的生态影响在很大程度上被忽略了。通过比较“堤坝”和“堤坝拆除”方案下的模拟洪水制度,我们考察了威斯康星河沿岸的防洪世纪。我们还使用野外采样来确定堤防是否改变了主要洪泛区林木的分布。由于堤坝导致的洪水阶段(高度)的增加很小,只有几厘米。这主要是由于堤坝的位置,在某些地区,其距离洪泛区仅数百米。与河道收缩和洪水幅度增加引起的堤坝增加相比,堤坝引起的堤岸洪水速度的增加很小。通常,堤防对较大规模事件的阶段性洪水和堤岸洪水速度影响更大。在堤坝外侧(高地一侧)的平均洪水次数和洪水天数较低,由于没有洪水泛滥,这些地区的河流电力为零。这些区域对于几种耐水树种(枫树枫叶和水曲柳)的重要性值(IV)也较低,而对于某些不耐洪树种(Quercus velutina和Q. ellipsoidalis)的IV值较高。此外,在洪水数量,天数,洪水数量和几种优势树种的INS中,堤防内部区域(在堤防与河道之间)与完全未耕种的区域没有区别。堤岸的位置(退回到洪泛区)导致了类似的历史洪水制度,因此,与完全无斜坡的地区相比,堤防内部区域的洪泛树种类丰富。退潮堤坝可以通过维持通常在非干旱地区发现的树木种类的相对丰富性而提供重要的折衷,同时还可以进行一些洪水控制。涉及拆除堤坝的洪泛区恢复通常应以拆除干线堤坝(与河道相邻的堤坝)为目标,而不是拆除后退堤坝。 [参考:85]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号