首页> 外文期刊>Izvestiya. Physics of the solid earth >Correctives to the scheme of the Earth's structure inferred from new data on nutation, tides, and free oscillations
【24h】

Correctives to the scheme of the Earth's structure inferred from new data on nutation, tides, and free oscillations

机译:根据有关章动,潮汐和自由振荡的新数据推断出的地球结构方案的更正

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When analyzing the new high-accuracy observations of the forced nutation and tidal variations in the acceleration of gravity, it was found that they are in sharp contradiction to the present-day models of the Earth's interior based on seismic data and the data on the periods and damping constants of the free oscillations of the Earth. The elimination of these contradictions requires analyzing the uniqueness of the interpretation of the free oscillations of the Earth, taking into account the new data. Below, I present the initial results of solving the inverse problem of constructing radially symmetric frequency-dependent models of the Earth's internal structure, which are most consistent with the entire set of recent data on the amplitudes and phases of tides, forced nutation, and the periods and damping of free oscillations. The misfits were minimized by the method of steepest descent in the space of parameters determining the density (provided that the total mass and moment of inertia do not change) and the creep function at different depths. The constructed models are much more consistent with the observations not only within the entire interval of periods ranging from 1 s to 14 months, but also within narrower intervals. However, I note that the PREM model for the period of oscillations of 1 s remains almost the same (the travel-time residuals of the body waves are smaller than the errors of observation).
机译:在分析重力加速度的强迫章动和潮汐变化的新的高精度观测结果时,发现它们与基于地震数据和周期数据的当今地球内部模型存在明显矛盾。和地球自由振荡的阻尼常数。要消除这些矛盾,就需要考虑新数据,分析对地球自由振荡的解释的独特性。下面,我将介绍解决构造地球内部结构的径向对称频率相关模型的反问题的初步结果,这些模型与潮汐,强迫章动和潮汐的振幅和相位的最新数据集最一致。周期和自由振荡的阻尼。在确定密度(假设总质量和惯性矩不变)和不同深度的蠕变函数的参数空间中,通过最速下降方法将失配降至最低。构建的模型不仅在1 s到14个月的整个时间间隔内,而且在更窄的时间间隔内,都与观测值更加一致。但是,我注意到在1 s振荡周期内的PREM模型几乎保持不变(体波的传播时间残差小于观测误差)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号