首页> 外文期刊>East Asian science, technology and society: an international journal >Todd A. Henry, Assimilating Seoul: Japanese Rule and the Politics of Public Space in Colonial Korea, 1910-1945 Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014. 299 pp. $47.75.
【24h】

Todd A. Henry, Assimilating Seoul: Japanese Rule and the Politics of Public Space in Colonial Korea, 1910-1945 Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014. 299 pp. $47.75.

机译:托德·亨利(Todd A. Henry),《同化汉城:日本统治与殖民地朝鲜的公共空间政治》,1910-1945年,伯克利:加利福尼亚大学出版社,2014年。299页,每页47.75美元。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Todd A. Henry looks into the restructuring of public spaces in the colonial capital of Seoul to analyze the contradictory attempt of the Japanese colonial regime to "assimilate" Koreans as loyal but distinctively colonized subjects of the Japanese empire. Assimilating Seoul is hardly the first work that deals with this central policy of Japanese rule, but the author reframes it in two ways, making his study a novel contribution to the current understanding of assimilation. First, he extends the meaning of assimilation to include not just distinctive Japanization but also things that can "be captured under the more universal rubric of modernization" (5). That is, in addition to discussing the conversion to the Japanese religion of Shintoism, which he terms "spiritual assimilation," the author includes material and civic assimilations, by which he means, respectively, the effort to produce a productive workforce and the attempt to induce civic responsibility for hygiene as a common good. Second, in discussing this broadly defined assimilation, the author attempts to look for this policy as implemented in public spaces, where it was challenged, appropriated, and reshaped by various forces, instead of analyzing associated ideas within policy documents and elite writings.
机译:托德·亨利(Todd A. Henry)研究了首尔殖民地首府的公共空间结构,以分析日本殖民政权试图“同化”朝鲜人,使其成为日本帝国的忠诚但有特色的殖民主体。吸收汉城几乎不是处理日本统治这一中央政策的第一部著作,但作者以两种方式对其进行了重新构架,使他的研究对当前对同化的理解做出了新的贡献。首先,他将同化的含义扩展到不仅包括独特的日本化,而且还包括“可以在更为普遍的现代化规则下捕获的东西”(5)。也就是说,除了讨论他称其为“精神同化”的神道教向日本宗教的conversion依外,作者还包括物质同化和公民同化,这分别意味着他要为生产生产力的劳动而付出的努力和引起公民对公共卫生的责任。其次,在讨论这种广泛定义的同化过程时,作者试图寻找在公共场所实施的该政策,在那里它受到各种力量的挑战,挪用和重塑,而不是分析政策文件和精英著作中的相关思想。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号