首页> 外文期刊>Isis: An International Review Devoted to the History of Science and its Cultural Influences >The influence of Niels Bohr on Max Delbruck - Revisiting the hopes inspired by 'light and life'
【24h】

The influence of Niels Bohr on Max Delbruck - Revisiting the hopes inspired by 'light and life'

机译:尼尔斯·玻尔(Niels Bohr)对马克斯·德尔布吕克(Max Delbruck)的影响-重新审视“光与生活”带来的希望

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The impact of Niels Bohr's 1932 "Light and Life" lecture on Max Delbruck's lifelong search for a form of "complementarity" in biology is well documented and much discussed, but the precise nature of that influence remains subject to misunderstanding. The standard reading, which sees Delbruck's transition from physics into biology as inspired by the hope that investigation of biological phenomena might lead to a breakthrough discovery of new laws of physics, is colored much more by Erwin Schrodinger's What Is Life? (1944) than is often acknowledged. Bohr's view was that teleological and mechanistic descriptions are mutually exclusive yet jointly necessary for an exhaustive understanding of life. Although Delbruck's approach was empirical and less self-consciously philosophical, he shared Bohr's hope that scientific investigation would vindicate the view that at least some aspects of life are not reducible to physico-chemical terms.
机译:尼尔斯·玻尔(Niels Bohr)在1932年的“光与生命”讲座中对麦克斯·德尔布吕克(Max Delbruck)终生寻找生物学中一种“互补性”形式的影响已得到了充分的文献记载和讨论,但这种影响的确切性质仍然存在误解。该标准阅读书看到了德尔布鲁克从物理学到生物学的转变,这是受到对生物现象的研究可能会导致突破性发现新的物理学定律的希望所启发的,而欧文·薛定inger(Erwin Schrodinger)的《什么是生命? (1944)比通常公认的。玻尔的观点是,目的论和机械学描述是相互排斥的,但对于详尽地理解生活却是共同必要的。尽管德尔布鲁克的方法是经验主义的,而不是自觉的哲学性的,但他赞同玻尔的希望,即科学调查将证明以下观点:至少生命的某些方面无法还原为物理化学术语。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号