...
首页> 外文期刊>Investigative radiology >Ultrahigh-field 7-T magnetic resonance carotid vessel wall imaging: Initial experience in comparison with 3-T field strength
【24h】

Ultrahigh-field 7-T magnetic resonance carotid vessel wall imaging: Initial experience in comparison with 3-T field strength

机译:超高场7-T磁共振颈动脉壁成像:与3-T场强比较的初步经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the vessel wall enables determination of luminal area, vessel wall thickness, and atherosclerotic plaque characteristics. For clinical application, high spatial resolution, derived from optimal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), is paramount. Vessel wall MRI is expected to benefit from higher magnetic field strength. Therefore, the purposes of the present study were to develop an ultrahigh-field 7-T MRI hardware and protocols for vessel wall imaging of the carotid artery and to compare quantitative parameters of vessel wall morphology and image quality between 3-T and 7-T MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen volunteers (11 men and 7 women; mean [SD] age, 29 [7] years) underwent MRI examinations at 7 T (using a custom-built surface transmit/receive coil of 15-cm diameter) and at 3 T (using a commercial phased-array coil with 2 flexible oval elements, 14 × 17 cm each). Magnetic resonance imaging of the left common carotid artery vessel wall was performed at 7 T with identical in-plane resolution as that of 3-T MRI (0.46 × 0.46 mm), providing transverse T1- and T2-weighted images. Blinded analysis of morphologic measurements (luminal area and vessel wall area), SNR for vessel wall (SNRVW), and the CNR between the lumen and the vessel wall were compared between 7 and 3 T. RESULTS: Morphologic carotid vessel wall measurements were comparable between 7 and 3 T for both T1-weighted images (luminal area: intraclass correlation [ICC], 0.81 and vessel wall area: ICC, 0.84) and T2-weighted images (luminal area: ICC, 0.97 and vessel wall area: ICC, 0.92). At 7 T, SNRVW and CNR were significantly higher compared with 3-T MRI for both T1- (P < 0.001) and T2-weighted images (P < 0.05), with gain factors ranging from 1.3 to 3.6. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrahigh-field 7-T MR carotid vessel wall imaging is feasible. 7-T MRI of the common carotid artery has comparable accuracy for determining luminal area and vessel wall area and has improved SNRVW and CNR compared with 3-T MRI. Therefore, ultrahigh-field 7-T vessel wall MRI may enable a more detailed assessment of plaque morphology.
机译:目标:血管壁的磁共振成像(MRI)可以确定腔面积,血管壁厚度和动脉粥样硬化斑块特征。对于临床应用而言,从最佳信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)得出的高空间分辨率至关重要。预计血管壁MRI将受益于更高的磁场强度。因此,本研究的目的是开发用于颈动脉血管壁成像的超高场7-T MRI硬件和协议,并比较3-T和7-T之间血管壁形态和图像质量的定量参数核磁共振材料与方法:18名志愿者(11名男性和7名女性;平均[SD]年龄,29 [7]岁)在7 T(使用定制的直径为15 cm的表面发射/接收线圈)和MRI时进行了MRI检查。 3 T(使用带有2个挠性椭圆形元件的商业相控阵线圈,每个14×17 cm)。左颈总动脉壁的磁共振成像是在7 T时进行的,其面内分辨率与3-T MRI的相同(0.46×0.46 mm),提供横向的T1和T2加权图像。在7至3 T之间比较了形态学测量值(盲区面积和血管壁面积),血管壁SNR(SNRVW)以及管腔与血管壁之间的CNR的盲法分析。结果: T1加权图像(腔面积:类内相关性[ICC],0.81和血管壁面积:ICC,0.84)和T2加权图像(腔面积:ICC,0.97和血管壁面积:ICC,0.92)分别为7和3 T )。在7 T时,T1-(P <0.001)和T2加权图像(P <0.05)的SNRVW和CNR显着高于3-T MRI,增益因子在1.3到3.6之间。结论:超高场7-T MR颈动脉壁成像是可行的。与3-T MRI相比,颈总动脉的7-T MRI在确定管腔面积和血管壁面积方面具有可比的准确性,并且SNRVW和CNR有所改善。因此,超高视场7-T血管壁MRI可以更详细地评估斑块形态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号