首页> 外文期刊>International wound journal. >Concordance of Shape Risk Scale, a new pressure ulcer risk tool, with Braden Scale
【24h】

Concordance of Shape Risk Scale, a new pressure ulcer risk tool, with Braden Scale

机译:与新的压力性溃疡风险工具Shape Risk Scale和Braden Scale的一致性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The occurrence of pressure ulcers was examined in a cross-sectional study in 23 health care facilities and in home care involving 548 patients. The screening of pressure ulcer risk was assessed simultaneously using the Braden Scale and the new Shape Risk Scale (SRS), and the results were compared. The overall prevalence of pressure ulcers in the study population was 155% (85/548). The Braden Scale was performed as described in the literature. The direct concordance of the Braden and SRS scales was 46%. In more than 90% of cases, the SRS classified patients as well as or better than the Braden Scale. The SRS allocates patients significantly different from the Braden Scale into the risk categories, especially the difference is significant between the low and medium-risk categories. The greatest advantage of SRS to Braden Scale is that it correctly identifies patients with low risk of pressure ulcers. It is interesting that the two risk scores, taking into consideration the basically different pathophysiological factors, can still give rather similar results. The users considered that both scales are easy to use.
机译:在一项涉及548名患者的23个医疗保健机构和家庭护理中的横断面研究中,检查了压疮的发生情况。同时使用Braden量表和新的Shape Risk Scale(SRS)评估了压疮风险的筛查,并对结果进行了比较。在研究人群中,压疮的总体患病率为155%(85/548)。如文献所述进行布莱登量表。 Braden和SRS量表的直接一致性为46%。在超过90%的病例中,SRS对患者的分类与Braden量表相当或更好。 SRS将与Braden量表明显不同的患者分配到风险类别中,尤其是在低风险类别和中风险类别之间存在显着差异。 SRS达到Braden Scale的最大优势在于,它可以正确识别出压疮风险低的患者。有趣的是,考虑到基本不同的病理生理因素,这两个风险评分仍可得出相当相似的结果。用户认为两种秤都易于使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号