...
首页> 外文期刊>Investigative ophthalmology & visual science >Digital versus film Fundus photography for research grading of diabetic retinopathy severity.
【24h】

Digital versus film Fundus photography for research grading of diabetic retinopathy severity.

机译:数码与胶片眼底照相技术可对糖尿病性视网膜病变的严重程度进行分级。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To assess agreement between digital and film photography for research classification of diabetic retinopathy severity. METHODS: Digital and film photographs from a 152-eye cohort with a full spectrum of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels were assessed for repeatability of grading within each image medium and for agreement on ETDRS discrete severity levels, ascending severity thresholds, and presence or absence of diabetic retinopathy index lesions, between digital and 35-mm slides (film). Digital photographs were color balanced to match film. RESULTS: There was substantial agreement (kappa = 0.61, kappa(w) [linear weighted] = 0.87) in classification of ETDRS diabetic retinopathy severity levels between digital images and film. Marginal homogeneity analyses found no significant difference in frequency distributions on the severity scale (P = 0.21, Bhapkar test). The kappa results ranged from 0.72 to 0.95 for presence or absence of eight ascending diabetic retinopathy severity thresholds. Repeatability of grading between readers viewing digital images was equal to or better than that obtained with film (pair-wise interreader kappa for digital images ranged from 0.47 to 0.57 and for film from 0.43 to 0.57. The kappa results for identifying diabetic retinopathy lesions ranged from moderate to almost perfect. Moderate agreement of intraretinal microvascular abnormalities and venous beading between digital images and film accounted for slightly lower concordance for severity thresholds >/=47 and for slightly lower interreader agreement within digital and film images at severity thresholds >/=43 and >/=47. CONCLUSIONS: Under controlled circumstances, digital photography can equal the reliability of 35-mm slides for research classification of ETDRS severity level.
机译:目的:评估数字摄影和胶片摄影之间对糖尿病性视网膜病变严重程度的研究分类的一致性。方法:从152眼队列的数字和胶片照片中,对早期糖尿病性视网膜病研究(ETDRS)严重程度的全范围进行评估,评估每种图像介质内分级的可重复性,并就ETDRS离散严重程度水平,升高严重程度阈值,在数字幻灯片和35毫米幻灯片(胶片)之间是否存在糖尿病性视网膜病变指数病变。数码照片色彩平衡,以匹配胶卷。结果:在数字图像和胶片之间的ETDRS糖尿病性视网膜病变严重程度分类中,存在相当大的一致性(kappa = 0.61,kappa(w)[线性加权] = 0.87)。边际同质性分析发现严重程度等级的频率分布无显着差异(P = 0.21,Bhapkar检验)。对于是否存在八个递增的糖尿病性视网膜病严重度阈值,卡帕结果的范围为0.72至0.95。阅读者在观看数字图像时的评分可重复性等于或优于胶片(成对互读器kappa的数字图像范围为0.47至0.57,胶片为0.43至0.57)。识别糖尿病性视网膜病变的kappa结果范围为中度至几乎完美。数字图像和胶片之间的视网膜内微血管异常和静脉串珠的适度一致性导致严重性阈值> / = 47时较低的一致性,而严重度阈值> / = 43时数字图像和胶片图像中的阅读器间一致性稍低。 > / = 47。结论:在受控情况下,对于ETDRS严重性等级的研究分类,数字摄影可以等同于35毫米幻灯片的可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号