首页> 外文期刊>International Orthopaedics >Treatment of distal tibial shaft fractures by three different surgical methods: A randomized, prospective study
【24h】

Treatment of distal tibial shaft fractures by three different surgical methods: A randomized, prospective study

机译:通过三种不同的手术方法治疗胫骨远端骨折:一项随机,前瞻性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: A few studies focused on the methods of treatment for displaced distal tibial shaft fractures have been published, all of which compared two different methods. In this randomized, prospective study, we aimed to compare minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis, locking intramedullary nail stabilization and external fixation combined with limited open reduction and absorbable internal fixation for distal tibial shaft fractures by assessing complications and secondary procedures. Methods: From November 2002 to June 2012, 137 skeletally mature patients with displaced distal tibial shaft fractures with or without fibula fracture were randomized to be treated by minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (group A, n=46), locking intramedullary nail (group B, n=46) or external fixation combined with limited open reduction and absorbable internal fixation (group C, n=45). Age, gender, mechanism of injury, fracture pattern and presence of open fracture were equally distributed among the three groups. Indexes for evaluation included hospital stay, operative time, time to radiographic union, union status, infection and the incidence of re-operation.Mazur ankle score was introduced for functional evaluation. Statistics Analysis System (SAS) 9.2 was used for analysis. Results: A total of 121 patients were included in the final analysis (group A 42, group B 40 and group C 39) and evaluated after a mean of 14.8 months follow-up. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in hospital stay, time to radiographic union and the incidence of union status among the three groups. Although group C was associated with less secondary procedures versus groups A and B, it was related with more pin tract infections (15.4%). Anterior knee pain occurred frequently after locking intramedullary nailing (37.5%) and the irritation symptoms were more frequently encountered in group A (59.5%). There was no difference in ankle function between the three methods after operation (P>0.05). Conclusions: We consider that the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis, locking intramedullary nail stabilization and external fixation combined with limited open reduction and absorbable internal fixation techniques are all efficient methods for treating distal tibia fractures. With its wide indications, external fixation combined with limited open reduction and absorbable internal fixation leads to minimal soft tissue complication, good functional result and no local soft tissue irritation or implant removal.
机译:目的:已经发表了一些针对胫骨远端移位的骨折的治疗方法的研究,所有这些研究都比较了两种不同的方法。在这项随机,前瞻性研究中,我们旨在通过评估并发症和继发程序,比较微创钢板接骨术,锁定髓内钉稳定和外固定结合有限的切开复位和可吸收内固定治疗胫骨远端骨折的能力。方法:自2002年11月至2012年6月,将137具骨骼成熟的胫骨远端移位并伴或不伴腓骨骨折的患者随机分为微创钢板内固定治疗(A组,n = 46),锁骨髓内钉治疗(B组,n组)。 n = 46)或外固定结合有限的切开复位和可吸收的内固定(C组,n = 45)。三组患者的年龄,性别,损伤机制,骨折类型和开放性骨折的分布均等。评估指标包括住院时间,手术时间,X线摄影时间,工会状态,感染和再次手术的发生率。引入Mazur踝关节评分进行功能评估。使用统计分析系统(SAS)9.2进行分析。结果:最终分析共纳入121例患者(A组42,B 40组和C 39组),平均随访14.8个月后进行评估。三组患者的住院时间,X线摄片时间和工会状况的发生率无显着性差异(P> 0.05)。尽管与A组和B组相比,C组与较少的二次手术相关,但与更多的针道感染有关(15.4%)。锁定髓内钉后常发生膝前疼痛(37.5%),A组更常见刺激症状(59.5%)。三种方法术后踝关节功能无差异(P> 0.05)。结论:我们认为微创钢板内固定,锁定髓内钉稳定和外固定结合有限的切开复位和可吸收的内固定技术都是治疗胫骨远端骨折的有效方法。具有广泛的适应症,外固定结合有限的切开复位和可吸收的内固定导致最小的软组织并发症,良好的功能效果,并且没有局部的软组织刺激或植入物去除。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号