...
首页> 外文期刊>Investigational new drugs. >Convection-enhancement delivery of liposomal formulation of oxaliplatin shows less toxicity than oxaliplatin yet maintains a similar median survival time in F98 glioma-bearing rat model
【24h】

Convection-enhancement delivery of liposomal formulation of oxaliplatin shows less toxicity than oxaliplatin yet maintains a similar median survival time in F98 glioma-bearing rat model

机译:奥沙利铂脂质体制剂的对流增强递送显示出比奥沙利铂更低的毒性,但在荷F98胶质瘤的大鼠模型中维持相似的中位生存时间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Results of clinical trials with oxaliplatin in treating glioblastoma are dismal. Previous works showed that intravenous (i.v.) delivery of oxaliplatin did not increase the survival of F98 glioma-bearing Fisher rats. Low accumulation of the drug in tumor cells is presumed to be responsible for the lack of antitumor effect. In the present study, convection-enhanced delivery (CED) was used to directly inject oxaliplatin in brain tumor implanted in rats. Since CED can led to severe toxicity, the liposomal formulation of oxaliplatin (Lipoxal (TM)) was also assessed. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oxaliplatin was 10 mu g, while that of Lipoxal (TM) was increased by 3-times reaching 30 mu g. Median survival time (MeST) of F98 glioma-bearing rats injected with 10 mu g oxaliplatin by CED was 31 days, 7.5 days longer than untreated control (p = 0.0002); while CED of 30 mu g Lipoxal (TM) reached the same result. Compared to previous study on i.v. delivery of these drugs, their injection by CED significantly increased their tumoral accumulations as well as MeSTs in the F98 glioma bearing rat model. The addition of radiotherapy (15 Gy) to CED of oxaliplatin or Lipoxal (TM) increased the MeST by 4.0 and 3.0 days, respectively. The timing of radiotherapy (4 h or 24 h after CED) produced similar results. However, the treatment was better tolerated when radiotherapy was performed 24 h after CED. In conclusion, a better tumoral accumulation was achieved when oxaliplatin and Lipoxal (TM) were injected by CED. The liposomal encapsulation of oxaliplatin reduced its toxic, while maintaining its antitumor potential.
机译:奥沙利铂治疗胶质母细胞瘤的临床试验结果令人沮丧。先前的研究表明,静脉内(i.v.)输送奥沙利铂不会增加F98胶质瘤荷Fisher大鼠的存活率。推测该药物在肿瘤细胞中的低积累是缺乏抗肿瘤作用的原因。在本研究中,对流增强递送(CED)用于将奥沙利铂直接注射到大鼠脑肿瘤中。由于CED可以导致严重的毒性,因此还评估了奥沙利铂的脂质体制剂(Lipoxal(TM))。奥沙利铂的最大耐受剂量(MTD)为10微克,而利普沙尔(TM)的最大耐受剂量增加了3倍达到30微克。 CED注射10μg奥沙利铂的F98胶质瘤大鼠的中位生存时间(MeST)为31天,比未处理的对照组长7.5天(p = 0.0002);而30μg Lipoxal(TM)的CED达到了相同的结果。与之前在i.v.递送这些药物后,通过CED注射在F98胶质瘤大鼠模型中显着增加了其肿瘤蓄积和MeSTs。在奥沙利铂或Lipoxal(TM)的CED上加放疗(15 Gy)分别使MeST延长了4.0天和3.0天。放疗的时间(CED后4小时或24小时)产生了相似的结果。但是,当CED后24小时进行放疗时,治疗的耐受性更好。总之,通过CED注射奥沙利铂和Lipoxal(TM)可获得更好的肿瘤蓄积。奥沙利铂的脂质体封装降低了其毒性,同时保持了其抗肿瘤潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号