首页> 外文期刊>International ophthalmology >Detection of retinal lesions in diabetic retinopathy: comparative evaluation of 7-field digital color photography versus red-free photography
【24h】

Detection of retinal lesions in diabetic retinopathy: comparative evaluation of 7-field digital color photography versus red-free photography

机译:糖尿病性视网膜病变中视网膜病变的检测:7场数字彩色摄影与无红摄影的比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Red-free light allows better detection of vascular lesions as this wavelength is absorbed by hemoglobin; however, the current gold standard for the detection and grading of diabetic retinopathy remains 7-field color fundus photography. The goal of this study was to compare the ability of 7-field fundus photography using red-free light to detect retinopathy lesions with corresponding images captured using standard 7-field color photography. Non-stereoscopic standard 7-field 30° digital color fundus photography and 7-field 30° digital red-free fundus photography were performed in 200 eyes of 103 patients with various grades of diabetic retinopathy ranging from mild to moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy to proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The color images (n = 1,400) were studied with corresponding red-free images (n = 1,400) by one retina consultant (PV) and two senior residents training in retina. The various retinal lesions [microaneurysms, hemorrhages, hard exudates, soft exudates, intra-retinal microvascular anomalies (IRMA), neovascularization of the retina elsewhere (NVE), and neovascularization of the disc (NVD)] detected by all three observers in each of the photographs were noted followed by determination of agreement scores using κ values (range 0?1). Kappa coefficient was categorized as poor (≤0), slight (0.01–0.20), fair (0.2 –0.40), moderate (0.41–0.60), substantial (0.61–0.80), and almost perfect (0.81–1). The number of lesions detected by red-free images alone was higher for all observers and all abnormalities except hard exudates. Detection of IRMA was especially higher for all observers with red-free images. Between image pairs, there was substantial agreement for detection of hard exudates (average κ = 0.62, range 0.60?0.65) and moderate agreement for detection of hemorrhages (average κ = 0.52, range 0.45?0.58), soft exudates (average κ = 0.51, range 0.42?0.61), NVE (average κ = 0.47, range 0.39?0.53), and NVD (average κ = 0.51, range 0.45?0.54). Fair agreement was noted for detection of microaneurysms (average κ = 0.29, range 0.20?0.39) and IRMA (average κ = 0.23, range 0.23?0.24). Inter-observer agreement with color images was substantial for hemorrhages (average κ = 0.72), soft exudates (average κ = 0.65), and NVD (average κ = 0.65); moderate for microaneurysms (average κ = 0.42), NVE (average κ = 0.44), and hard exudates (average κ = 0.59) and fair for IRMA (average κ = 0.21). Inter-observer agreement with red-free images was substantial for hard exudates (average κ = 0.63) and moderate for detection of hemorrhages (average κ = 0.56), SE (average κ = 0.60), IRMA (average κ = 0.50), NVE (average κ = 0.44), and NVD (average κ = 0.45). Digital red-free photography has a higher level of detection ability for all retinal lesions of diabetic retinopathy. More advanced grades of retinopathy are likely to be detected earlier with red-free imaging because of its better ability to detect IRMA, NVE, and NVD. Red-free monochromatic imaging of the retina is a more effective and less costly alternative for detection of vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy.
机译:无红光可以更好地检测血管病变,因为该波长被血红蛋白吸收。然而,目前用于糖尿病性视网膜病变的检测和分级的金标准仍然是7场彩色眼底照相。这项研究的目的是比较使用无红光的7场眼底摄影检测视网膜病变的能力以及使用标准7场彩色摄影术捕获的相应图像的能力。在103例患有轻度至中度非增生性糖尿病视网膜病变至轻度至中度非增生性糖尿病视网膜病变的103例患者的200只眼中,进行了非立体标准的7视场30°数字彩色眼底照相和7视场30°数字无红眼底照相增生性糖尿病视网膜病变。由一名视网膜顾问(PV)和两名在视网膜中接受培训的高级居民研究了彩色图像(n = 1,400)和相应的无红图像(n = 1,400)。每位三位观察者分别检测到各种视网膜病变[微动脉瘤,出血,硬性渗出物,软性渗出物,视网膜内微血管异常(IRMA),其他部位视网膜的新血管形成(NVE)和椎间盘的新血管形成(NVD)]。记录照片,然后使用κ值(范围0?1)确定一致性评分。卡伯系数分为:差(≤0),轻微(0.01–0.20),中等(0.2 –0.40),中等(0.41-0.60),实质(0.61-0.80)和几乎完美(0.81-1)。对于所有观察者和除硬性渗出物以外的所有异常,仅通过无红色图像检测到的病变数量就更高。对于所有无红图像的观察者,IRMA的检出率均更高。在图像对之间,检测硬性渗出物(平均κ= 0.62,范围0.60?0.65)基本一致,检测出血(中度κ= 0.52,范围0.45?0.58)中等程度一致,检测软性渗出物(平均κ= 0.51) ,范围0.42到0.61),NVE(平均κ= 0.47,范围0.39到0.53)和NVD(平均κ= 0.51,范围0.45到0.54)。观察到微动脉瘤(平均κ= 0.29,范围0.20-0.39)和IRMA(平均κ= 0.23,范围0.23-0.24)的检测结果相当一致。观察者之间的彩色图像一致性对于出血(平均κ= 0.72),软性渗出液(平均κ= 0.65)和NVD(平均κ= 0.65)是很重要的。对于微动脉瘤(平均κ= 0.42),NVE(平均κ= 0.44)和硬性渗出液(平均κ= 0.59)适中,对于IRMA(平均κ= 0.21)适中。观察者之间对无渗出图像的一致性对于硬性渗出液而言是重要的(平均κ= 0.63),对于出血的检测是中等的(平均κ= 0.56),SE(平均κ= 0.60),IRMA(平均κ= 0.50),NVE (平均κ= 0.44)和NVD(平均κ= 0.45)。对于糖尿病性视网膜病的所有视网膜病变,无数字化数码摄影的检测能力更高。无红光成像可能会更早地检测出更高级别的视网膜病变,因为它具有更好的检测IRMA,NVE和NVD的能力。视网膜的无红单色成像是检测威胁视力的糖尿病性视网膜病的更有效且成本更低的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号