...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of obstetric anesthesia >Use of anaesthetic rooms in obstetric anaesthesia; a postal survey of obstetric anaesthetists and departments in the United Kingdom.
【24h】

Use of anaesthetic rooms in obstetric anaesthesia; a postal survey of obstetric anaesthetists and departments in the United Kingdom.

机译:在产科麻醉中使用麻醉室;英国对产科麻醉师和部门的邮政调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Use of anaesthetic rooms has been much discussed in the UK in recent years, but attitudes and practices of obstetric anaesthetists regarding their use for caesarean section have never been sought. METHOD: A postal survey was conducted to discover the extent of use of anaesthetic rooms versus operating theatre for induction of anaesthesia and reasons for using or not using them. Questionnaires regarding individual practices were sent to 400 randomly selected members of the Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association ( approximately 25% of UK membership). Questionnaires regarding departmental policies were sent to 100 "clinicians responsible for surveys" (approximately 38% of departments providing obstetric anaesthesia in the UK). RESULTS: For elective caesarean section, 70% of individual clinicians never used an anaesthetic room, 9% rarely, 5% usually, 9% for all regional anaesthetics and 6% always. For emergency caesarean section the corresponding figures were 83%, 5%, 5%, 3% and 2% respectively. Use of the anaesthetic room was independent of the seniority of anaesthetists. In 68% of departments it was standard practice or policy to induce all anaesthetics for caesarean section in the operating room. Conversely, only 1% of departments had a policy to induce all anaesthetics in the anaesthetic room. Patient safety was the usual reason given for anaesthetising in the operating room. CONCLUSION: The majority of obstetric anaesthetists have abandoned the use of anaesthetic induction rooms, the main reason being patient safety. For the same reason, two-thirds of departments providing obstetric anaesthesia consider induction of anaesthesia in the operating room their standard practice.
机译:背景:近年来,在英国,麻醉室的使用已被广泛讨论,但是从未寻求过产科麻醉师关于其用于剖腹产的态度和实践。方法:进行邮政调查,以了解麻醉室与手术室对麻醉诱导的使用程度以及使用或不使用麻醉室的原因。有关个人做法的问卷被发送给随机选择的400名产科麻醉师协会成员(约占英国会员的25%)。有关部门政策的调查表已发送给100位“负责调查的临床医生”(在英国,约有38%的部门提供产科麻醉)。结果:对于选择性剖腹产,70%的临床医生从未使用过麻醉室,9%的患者很少使用,通常为5%,所有区域麻醉剂的使用率为9%,始终为6%。对于紧急剖腹产,相应数字分别为83%,5%,5%,3%和2%。麻醉室的使用与麻醉师的资历无关。在68%的科室中,在手术室中对剖腹产进行全麻麻醉是标准做法或政策。相反,只有1%的部门制定了在麻醉室中诱导所有麻醉剂的政策。患者安全是在手术室进行麻醉的通常原因。结论:大多数产科麻醉师已放弃使用麻醉诱导室,主要原因是患者安全。出于同样的原因,提供产科麻醉的部门中有三分之二认为在手术室进行麻醉是他们的标准做法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号