首页> 外文期刊>Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science >THE IMPACTS OF TRANSITION FROM FLOOD IRRIGATION TO DRIP IRRIGATION METHOD ON PLANT WATER CONSUMPTION AND YIELD IN APPLE GROWING
【24h】

THE IMPACTS OF TRANSITION FROM FLOOD IRRIGATION TO DRIP IRRIGATION METHOD ON PLANT WATER CONSUMPTION AND YIELD IN APPLE GROWING

机译:从灌溉到滴灌过渡对苹果生长中植物耗水量和产量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study elucidates the effects of transition from flood irrigation to drip irrigation method on apple trees regarding the water consumption and yield of the plant in 2008 and 2009. Starkrimson Delicious variety grafted onto seedling rootstock was used in the study. The studied apple trees had been irrigated by flood irrigation for many years. During the study, flood irrigation was continued at one part of the orchard, and drip irrigation was applied with different irrigation programs at the remaining parts of the orchard. Irrigation interval was held 20 days for flood irrigation (conventional) method. For drip irrigation, two different irrigation intervals (I =4 days, 1=1 days) and four different pan coefficients (K_(cp1)=0.50, K_(cp2)=0.75, K_(cp3)=1.0, K_(cp4)=1.25) were used in the study. The highest amounts of irrigation water and plant water consumptions were determined for flood irrigation treatment for both years. Expanding the irrigation interval and increasing the pan coefficient led toan increase in plant water consumption during drip irrigation treatments. The highest amount of plant water consumption was determined in IjK_(cp4) treatment. Statistically, while the yield with flood irrigation treatment was higher than K_(cpl) and K_(cp2) treatment, the yield data of K_(cp3) and K_(cp4) treatments were similar in both years. Irrigation levels (K_(cp)) influenced the yield (p < 0.01); however, irrigation intervals and irrigation intervals x irrigation level interaction did not have any impact on the yield. Kcp_3 and Kcp_4 (1.25) represented a more marketable fruit size (extra and class 1) than flood irrigation. As a result, during the application of drip irrigation for the apple trees, which were previously irrigated, by flood irrigation for many years, the irrigation interval and pan coefficient (K_(cp)) under similar climatic and soil conditions were considered as 4 days and 1.0, respectively.
机译:这项研究阐明了在2008年和2009年从洪水灌溉向滴灌灌溉的过渡方式对苹果树的用水量和产量的影响。该研究使用了嫁接在苗木砧木上的Starkrimson Delicious品种。被研究的苹果树已经通过洪水灌溉进行了多年灌溉。在研究过程中,果园的一部分继续进行洪水灌溉,果园的其余部分采用不同的灌溉程序进行滴灌。对于常规灌溉方式,灌溉间隔为20天。对于滴灌,两个不同的灌溉间隔(I = 4天,1 = 1天)和四个不同的锅系数(K_(cp1)= 0.50,K_(cp2)= 0.75,K_(cp3)= 1.0,K_(cp4) = 1.25)用于研究。确定了这两年中用于灌溉灌溉的最高灌溉水量和植物耗水量。延长灌溉间隔和提高水势系数导致滴灌处理期间植物耗水量的增加。在IjK_(cp4)处理中确定了最高的植物耗水量。从统计学上讲,虽然洪水灌溉处理的产量高于K_(cpl)和K_(cp2)处理,但两年的K_(cp3)和K_(cp4)处理的产量数据相似。灌溉水平(K_(cp))影响产量(p <0.01);但是,灌溉间隔和灌溉间隔x灌溉水平的相互作用对产量没有任何影响。与洪水灌溉相比,Kcp_3和Kcp_4(1.25)表示更适销实的水果大小(额外和1类)。结果,在对以前灌溉的苹果树进行滴灌的过程中,通过多年的洪水灌溉,在相似的气候和土壤条件下,灌溉间隔和盆栽系数(K_(cp))被视为4天和1.0。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号