首页> 外文期刊>Invasive Plant Science and Management >Does a Diflufenzopyr Plus Dicamba Premix Synergize Russian Knapweed (Acroptilon repens) Control with Auxinic Herbicides
【24h】

Does a Diflufenzopyr Plus Dicamba Premix Synergize Russian Knapweed (Acroptilon repens) Control with Auxinic Herbicides

机译:Diflufenzopyr Plus麦草畏预混剂是否与增效除草剂增效了俄罗斯藜(Acroptilon repens)的防治效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Diflufenzopyr is a synergist that improves broadleaf weed control when mixed with certain auxinic herbicides. In nonagricultural settings, it is only available in a premix with dicamba, which is labeled for noncrop sites, pasture, hay, and rangeland. Our objectives were to determine the influence of diflufenzopyr + dicamba when applied with auxinic herbicides for Russian knapweed control. Studies were conducted near Ethete, WY, from 2005 to 2008 in a pasture heavily infested with Russian knapweed. Treatments were applied in the fall (September) and included aminopyralid, clopyralid, clopyralid + 2,4-D, clopyralid + triclopyr, and picloram at standard and reduced rates, with and without diflufenzopyr + dicamba. At 12 and at 24 mo after treatment (MAT), diflufenzopyr + dicamba did not influence Russian knapweed control when applied with standard rates of aminopyralid, clopyralid, clopyralid + 2,4-D, clopyralid + triclopyr, or picloram. All of these treatments except clopyralid + 2,4-D consistently provided E80% control 24 MAT. Reduced-rate herbicide interactions with diflufenzopyr + dicamba were also not significant at 12 MAT. However, at 24 MAT, aminopyralid applied with diflufenzopyr + dicamba controlled Russian knapweed 83% compared with 59% when aminopyralid was applied alone. Russian knapweed control with all other reduced-rate treatments, except picloram, fell below 80%. These results indicate that diflufenzopyr + dicamba does not generally improve Russian knapweed control at 12 or 24 MAT with either standard or reduced rates of typical fall, auxinic herbicide treatments.
机译:当与某些生长素除草剂混合使用时,双氟芬草胺是一种增效剂,可改善阔叶杂草的防治效果。在非农业环境中,仅可与麦草畏混合使用,后者被标记为非农作物种植地,牧场,干草和牧场。我们的目标是确定双氟芬唑草+麦草畏与植物生长素类除草剂一起用于俄罗斯根结线虫防治的影响。 2005年至2008年,在怀俄明州埃塞特附近的一个牧场上进行了大量研究,该牧场被俄罗斯菜蝇大量繁殖。在秋季(9月)进行了治疗,包括氨基吡啶,氯吡格雷,氯吡格雷+ 2,4-D,clopyralid + triclopyr和picloram,标准剂量和降低剂量,有和没有diflufenzopyr +麦草畏。在治疗(MAT)后的12和24 mo,当以标准浓度的氨基pyralid,clopyralid,clopyralid + 2,4-D,clopyralid + triclopyr或picloram施用时,diflufenzopyr +麦草畏不会影响俄罗斯的藜科控制。除氯吡格雷+ 2,4-D外,所有这些治疗均一致地提供了E80%的对照24 MAT。在12 MAT时,除草剂与敌百虫唑+麦草畏的交互作用速率也不显着。但是,在24 MAT时,与双氟芬唑草酮+麦草畏一起施用的氨基吡喃酮控制的俄罗斯菜蝇为83%,而单独使用氨基吡咯烷酮时为59%。除吡咯仑外,俄罗斯对所有其他减价处理方法的控制都低于80%。这些结果表明,在标准或下降的典型生长素除草剂处理速率下,双氟芬唑草+麦草畏通常不能改善在12或24 MAT时对俄罗斯矢车菊的控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号