...
首页> 外文期刊>Interventional cardiology. >PC trial: percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism
【24h】

PC trial: percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism

机译:PC试验:经皮封闭卵圆孔未闭的隐源性栓塞

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The presence of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) allowing paradoxical embolisms has been postulated as one of the main mechanisms in cryptogenetic embolism. The Amplatzer? PFO Occluder (St Jude Medical, MN, USA) is a self-expanding double-disc device, made of nitinol with a polyester fabric patch sewn into both discs, with a flexible and stretchable connector between the discs.In patients with a PFO who presented with a cryptogenetic embolism, causing ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA) or a peripheral thromboembolic event, Meier and colleagues conducted a multicenter, randomized, superiority trial comparing percutaneous PFO closure with the Amplatzer PFO Occluder versus medical therapy with oral anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy, at the discretion of the treating physician.Between 2000 and 2009, a total of 414 patients were randomized 1:1 to device or medical therapy in 29 enrolling centers. The device was successfully implanted into 95.9% of patients. No major complications, defined as cardiac death, major bleeding or device emboli-zation, were described. The mean follow-up was 4.1 years in the device group and 4.0 years in the medical therapy group,and the data were analyzed with intention-to-treat. The primary end point, which was a composite end point of death, non-fatal stroke, TIA or peripheral embolism, occurred in 3.4% in the device group and in 5.2% in the medical therapy group (hazard ratio: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.24-1.62; p = 0.34). No significant differences were observed in nonfatal stroke (0.5 vs 2.4%; p = 0.14), TIA (2.5 vs 3.3%; p = 0.56) and noncardiovascular death (1.0 vs 0.0%; p = 0.24) between the device group and medical therapy group, respectively. There were no cardiovascular deaths or peripheral embolisms. The authors concluded that percutaneous closure of PFO for secondary prevention of cryptogenetic embolisms did not significantly reduce the risk of recurrent embolic events or death compared with medical therapy.
机译:卵圆孔未闭(PFO)的存在被认为是悖论性栓塞的前提,被认为是密码遗传栓塞的主要机制之一。 Amplatzer? PFO Occluder(美国明尼苏达州圣裘德医疗公司)是一种自膨胀双盘器械,由镍钛合金制成,缝有聚酯纤维补丁,缝在两个椎间盘之间,椎间盘之间具有可伸缩的可伸缩连接器。 Meier及其同事进行了一项隐匿性栓塞,导致缺血性中风,短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或外周血栓栓塞事件,进行了一项多中心,随机,优越性试验,比较了经皮PFO封闭与Amplatzer PFO封堵器与药物治疗与口服抗凝或抗血小板药的比较在2000年至2009年之间,在29个注册中心将414例患者按1:1比例随机分配至器械或药物治疗。该设备已成功植入95.9%的患者中。没有描述严重并发症,定义为心源性死亡,重大出血或器械栓塞。装置组的平均随访时间为4。1年,药物治疗组的平均随访时间为4。0年,并采用意向性治疗对数据进行了分析。主要终点是死亡,非致命性中风,TIA或周围性栓塞的综合终点,在器械组为3.4%,在药物治疗组为5.2%(危险比:0.63; 95%CI) :0.24-1.62; p = 0.34)。装置组和药物治疗之间的非致命性卒中(0.5 vs 2.4%; p = 0.14),TIA(2.5 vs 3.3%; p = 0.56)和非心血管死亡(1.0 vs 0.0%; p = 0.24)没有观察到显着差异。组。没有心血管死亡或周围性栓塞。作者得出的结论是,与药物治疗相比,经皮闭合PFO进行二级预防隐源性栓塞没有明显降低复发​​性栓塞事件或死亡的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号