首页> 外文期刊>International Legal Materials >INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO KURIC AND OTHERS V. SLOVENIA & KURIC AND OTHERS V. SLOVENIA (JUST SATISFACTION) (EUR. CT. H.R.)
【24h】

INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO KURIC AND OTHERS V. SLOVENIA & KURIC AND OTHERS V. SLOVENIA (JUST SATISFACTION) (EUR. CT. H.R.)

机译:库里茨和其他人诉斯洛文尼亚的介绍性说明和库里克和其他人诉斯洛文尼亚的说明(仅满足)(EUR。CT。H.R.)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The dissolution of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) brought in its wake massive bloodshed, as well as human rights violations not seen on the European continent since the end of the Second World War. It probed the boundaries of contemporary international law in numerous ways, including providing the first "field tests" of the doctrine of "responsibility to protect," which may turn out to be the biggest challenge to the notion of state sovereignty posed in centuries. The dissolution of the SFRY also brought about dislocations of a less dramatic, but, perhaps to those affected, a no less significant sort. Under the laws of the former SFRY, an individual became a citizen of one of the six constituent Republics by birth or naturalization and thereupon also acquired citizenship in the Federal Republic. There were no restrictions or limitations on the movement of individuals from one Republic to another, or on the rights of people who were citizens of a Republic different from the one in which they happened to reside. All of that changed when the SFRY disintegrated and the newly-independent states were tasked with regularizing the status of SFRY nationals residing within their borders who did not possess citizenship. Because these individuals shared language, culture, religion, and family ties with one Republic but had made their lives in another, they were frequently left without legal rights of any sort, in some instances even being consigned to statelessness, with very serious consequences. Suddenly transformed into "aliens" in places where they had lived their lives for decades, they were often without the right to work or to travel and looked forward to retirement years in which they would receive neither health care nor state pensions.
机译:南斯拉夫社会主义联邦共和国(SFRY)的解体导致了大规模的流血事件,以及自第二次世界大战以来在欧洲大陆从未见到的侵犯人权的事件。它以多种方式探究了当代国际法的边界,包括对“保护责任”学说进行了首次“实地检验”,这可能成为对数百年来提出的国家主权概念的最大挑战。 SFRY的解散也引起了不太严重的错位,但对受影响的人来说,错位也不少。根据前南斯拉夫社会主义共和国的法律,一个人通过出生或入籍成为六个组成共和国之一的公民,随即也获得了联邦共和国的公民身份。对于个人从一个共和国到另一个共和国的迁徙,或作为共和国公民的公民的权利与其所居住的国家不同,没有任何限制或限制。 SFRY解体后,所有这些都改变了,新独立的州被要求规范其边界内没有公民身份的SFRY国民的身份。由于这些人与一个共和国共享语言,文化,宗教和家庭纽带,但在另一个共和国生活,因此他们经常没有任何法律权利,在某些情况下甚至被赋予无国籍状态,从而带来非常严重的后果。在他们生活了几十年的地方,他们突然变成了“外国人”,他们常常没有工作或旅行的权利,并期待着退休之年,在那里他们既得不到医疗保健或国家养老金。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号