...
首页> 外文期刊>International Legal Materials >INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT: FLOMO ET AL. V. FIRESTONE NATURAL RUBBER CO., LLC
【24h】

INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT: FLOMO ET AL. V. FIRESTONE NATURAL RUBBER CO., LLC

机译:第七审美国上诉法院简介:FLOMO ET AL。五,费利松天然橡胶有限公司

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

U.S. courts have struggled in their interpretation and application of the Alien Tort Claims Act ("ATCA"), a statute that permits non-U.S. citizens to bring civil lawsuits in U.S. courts for violations of the law of nations, as defined by customary international law, regardless of where those violations occur. The rise in ATCA cases in recent years has led to divergent interpretations by U.S. federal courts regarding who may be held liable for violations of the law of nations. Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a petition for writ of certiorari in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. to resolve the split among the federal appellate courts regarding corporate liability under the ATCA. The Seventh Circuit's recent decision in Flomo et-al. v. Firestone Natural Rubber Co. further deepens this split and provides support for the conclusion that corporations can be liable under the ATCA.
机译:美国法院在解释和适用《外国人侵权索赔法》(“ ATCA”)方面一直处于挣扎状态,该法规允许非美国公民针对习惯国际法所定义的违反国家法的行为提起民事诉讼。 ,无论这些违规行为发生在哪里。近年来,ATCA案件的增加导致美国联邦法院对谁可能因违反国家法律而承担责任的解释存在分歧。最近,美国最高法院在Kiobel诉荷兰皇家石油公司(Kiobel v.Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.)中批准了证明书的请愿书,以解决联邦上诉法院之间有关ATCA下公司责任的分歧。第七巡回赛在Flomo等人的决定。 v。凡士通天然橡胶公司进一步加深了这种分歧,并为公司可以根据ATCA承担责任的结论提供了支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号