首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Probiotics & Prebiotics >USE OF PROBIOTICS IN PREVENTING ANTIBIOTIC ASSOCIATED DIARRHOEA AND CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE ASSOCIATED DIARRHOEA IN SPINAL INJURY CENTRES: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTICENTRE SURVEY
【24h】

USE OF PROBIOTICS IN PREVENTING ANTIBIOTIC ASSOCIATED DIARRHOEA AND CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE ASSOCIATED DIARRHOEA IN SPINAL INJURY CENTRES: AN INTERNATIONAL MULTICENTRE SURVEY

机译:预防脊髓损伤中心抗生素相关性腹泻和大肠结肠炎相关性腹泻的生物组学研究:国际多中心调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Probiotics may prevent antibiotic-associated-and Clostridium difficile-associated- diarrhoea (AAD/CDAD). Many spinal cord injury centres (SCICs) practitioners consider probiotics generically and may not realise that efficacy can be strain-, dose-, anddisease-specific. One to four SCICs per country (depending on population size) were contacted (UK:4; the Netherlands:3; Belgium: 1; Republic of Ireland: 1) to (a) determine if they stocked probiotics; (b) determine whether the use of those probiotics was evidence-based; and (c) document their C. difficile infection (CDI) practices. All nine SCICs responded to the survey (7 physicians, 3 microbiologists, 1 nurie and 2 dietitians). Five (55.5%) stocked probiotics; five1 different probiotics were identified. Four probiotics were preferred choice prevention of AAD/CDAD were Lactobacillus casei Shirota (44.4%), L. casei DN-114001 (22.2%), L. acidophilus (22.2%) and a mixed-strains probiotic (Ecologic Pro-AD) (11.1%). Only one evidence base study was identified supporting the use of probiotic for prevention ofAAD in SCI patients. Mean CDI cases per 10,000patient-days were 0.307 (s.d: 0.486, range 0.00 to 1.08). Definitions of diarrhoea and CDI varied among SCICs. Stocking probiotics for the prevention ofAADI CDAD is not common. There is only one single study showing efficiency of a particular strain in SCI populations. The study highlighted the importance of using a standardised definition of diarrhoea when conducting AADI CDAD research.
机译:益生菌可以预防与抗生素有关的和艰难梭菌相关的腹泻(AAD / CDAD)。许多脊髓损伤中心(SCIC)的从业人员普遍考虑益生菌,可能没有意识到功效可能是菌株,剂量和疾病特异性的。与每个国家的一到四个SCIC(取决于人口规模)进行了联系(英国:4;荷兰:3;比利时:1;爱尔兰共和国:1)至(a)确定他们是否储存了益生菌; (b)确定这些益生菌的使用是否基于证据; (c)记录其艰难梭菌感染(CDI)做法。所有9位SCIC都对调查做出了回应(7位医生,3位微生物学家,1位营养学家和2位营养师)。五种(55.5%)的益生菌库存;确定了5种不同的益生菌。首选四种预防AAD / CDAD的益生菌是干酪乳杆菌Shirota(44.4%),干酪乳杆菌DN-114001(22.2%),嗜酸乳杆菌(22.2%)和混合菌株益生菌(Ecologic Pro-AD)( 11.1%)。仅有一项证据基础研究被确定支持在SCI患者中使用益生菌预防AAD。每10,000病人日的CDI平均病例数为0.307(标准误:0.486,范围从0.00到1.08)。腹泻和CDI的定义在SCIC之间有所不同。放养益生菌以预防AADI CDAD并不常见。只有一项研究显示了特定菌株在SCI种群中的效率。这项研究强调了进行AADI CDAD研究时使用标准化腹泻定义的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号