首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics >Quality research in radiation oncology analysis of clinical performance measures in the management of gastric cancer
【24h】

Quality research in radiation oncology analysis of clinical performance measures in the management of gastric cancer

机译:放射肿瘤学治疗胃癌临床表现措施的质量研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The specific aim was to determine national patterns of radiation therapy (RT) practice in patients treated for stage IB-IV (nonmetastatic) gastric cancer (GC). Methods and Materials: A national process survey of randomly selected US RT facilities was conducted which retrospectively assessed demographics, staging, geographic region, practice setting, and treatment by using on-site record review of eligible GC cases treated from 2005 to 2007. Three clinical performance measures (CPMs), (1) use of computed tomography (CT)-based treatment planning; (2) use of dose volume histograms (DVHs) to evaluate RT dose to the kidneys and liver; and (3) completion of RT within the prescribed time frame; and emerging quality indicators, (i) use of intensity modulated RT (IMRT); (ii) use of image-guided tools (IGRT) other than CT for RT target delineation; and (iii) use of preoperative RT, were assessed. Results: CPMs were computed for 250 eligible patients at 45 institutions (median age, 62 years; 66% male; 60% Caucasian). Using 2000 American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria, 13% of patients were stage I, 29% were stage II, 32% were stage IIIA, 10% were stage IIIB, and 12% were stage IV. Most patients (43%) were treated at academic centers, 32% were treated at large nonacademic centers, and 25% were treated at small to medium sized facilities. Almost all patients (99.5%) underwent CT-based planning, and 75% had DVHs to evaluate normal tissue doses to the kidneys and liver. Seventy percent of patients completed RT within the prescribed time frame. IMRT and IGRT were used in 22% and 17% of patients, respectively. IGRT techniques included positron emission tomography (n=20), magnetic resonance imaging (n=1), respiratory gating and 4-dimensional CT (n=22), and on-board imaging (n=10). Nineteen percent of patients received preoperative RT. Conclusions: This analysis of radiation practice patterns for treating nonmetastatic GC indicates widespread adoption of CT-based planning with use of DVH to evaluate normal tissue doses. Most patients completed adjuvant RT in the prescribed time frame. IMRT and IGRT were not routinely incorporated into clinical practice during the 2005-2007 period. These data will be a benchmark for future Quality Research in Radiation Oncology GC surveys. ? 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:背景:具体目的是确定接受IB-IV期(非转移性)胃癌(GC)治疗的患者的放射治疗(RT)实践的国家模式。方法和材料:对2005年至2007年间接受治疗的合格GC病例进行现场记录回顾,对随机选择的美国RT设施进行了全国过程调查,以回顾性评估人口统计学,分期,地理区域,实践环境和治疗情况。三项临床绩效指标(CPM),(1)使用基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的治疗计划; (2)使用剂量体积直方图(DVHs)评估对肾脏和肝脏的RT剂量; (3)在规定的时间内完成RT;和新出现的质量指标,(i)使用强度调制RT(IMRT); (ii)使用CT以外的图像引导工具(IGRT)来描绘RT目标; (iii)术前放疗的使用情况进行了评估。结果:在45个机构(中位年龄为62岁;男性为66%;白种人为60%)中对250名合格患者进行了CPM计算。根据2000年美国癌症联合委员会的标准,13%的患者为I期,29%为II期,32%为IIIA期,10%为IIIB期,12%为IV期。大多数患者(43%)在学术中心接受治疗,32%在大型非学术中心接受治疗,25%在中小型机构接受治疗。几乎所有患者(99.5%)均进行了基于CT的计划,而75%的患者使用DVH评估了肾脏和肝脏的正常组织剂量。 70%的患者在规定的时间范围内完成了RT。 IMRT和IGRT分别用于22%和17%的患者。 IGRT技术包括正电子发射断层扫描(n = 20),磁共振成像(n = 1),呼吸门控和4维CT(n = 22)和车载成像(n = 10)。百分之十九的患者接受了术前放疗。结论:对用于治疗非转移性GC的放射实践模式的分析表明,使用DVH评估正常组织剂量已广泛采用基于CT的计划。大多数患者在规定的时间范围内完成了辅助放疗。 2005年至2007年期间,IMRT和IGRT并未常规纳入临床实践。这些数据将成为未来放射肿瘤学GC调查质量研究的基准。 ? 2013 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号