首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics >Magnetic resonance imaging- versus computed tomography-based target volume delineation of the glandular breast tissue (clinical target volume breast) in breast-conserving therapy: an exploratory study.
【24h】

Magnetic resonance imaging- versus computed tomography-based target volume delineation of the glandular breast tissue (clinical target volume breast) in breast-conserving therapy: an exploratory study.

机译:保乳治疗中腺体乳房组织(临床目标体积乳房)的磁共振成像与基于计算机断层扫描的目标体积描绘:一项探索性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To examine MRI and CT for glandular breast tissue (GBT) volume delineation and to assess interobserver variability. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen breast cancer patients underwent a planning CT and MRI, consecutively, in the treatment position. Four observers (two radiation oncologists and two radiologists) delineated the GBT according to the CT and separately to the MR images. Volumes, centers of mass, maximum extensions with standard deviations (SD), and interobserver variability were quantified. Observers viewed delineation differences between MRI and CT and delineation differences among observers. RESULTS: In cranio-lateral and cranio-medial directions, GBT volumes were delineated larger using MRI when compared with those delineated with CT. Center of mass on MRI shifted a mean (SD) 17% (4%) into the cranial direction and a mean 3% (4%) into the dorsal direction when compared with that on the planning CT. Only small variations between observers were noted. The GBT volumes were approximately 4% larger on MRI (mean [SD] ratio MRI to CT GBT volumes, 1.04 [0.06]). Findings were concordant with viewed MRI and CT images and contours. Conformity indices were only slightly different; mean conformity index was 77% (3%) for MRI and 79% (4%) for CT. Delineation differences arising from personal preferences remained recognizable irrespective of the imaging modality used. CONCLUSIONS: Contoured GBT extends substantially further into the cranio-lateral and cranio-medial directions on MRI when compared with CT. Interobserver variability is comparable for both imaging modalities. Observers should be aware of existing personal delineation preferences. Institutions are recommended to review and discuss target volume delineations and to design supplementary guidelines if necessary.
机译:目的:检查MRI和CT检查腺体乳腺组织(GBT)的体积,并评估观察者之间的差异。方法和材料:15例乳腺癌患者在治疗位置连续接受了计划的CT和MRI检查。四位观察员(两名放射肿瘤科医生和两名放射科医生)根据CT图像和MR图像分别描绘了GBT。量化体积,质心,最大延伸量(标准差(SD))和观察者间变异性。观察者观察了MRI和CT之间的轮廓差异以及观察者之间的轮廓差异。结果:在颅外侧和颅内侧方向,与CT相比,MRI勾画的GBT量更大。与计划的CT相比,MRI的质心向颅骨方向平均移动(SD)17%(4%),向背侧移动平均3%(4%)。只注意到观察者之间的微小差异。 MRI上的GBT量大约大4%(MRI与CT的GBT量之比[SD]平均为1.04 [0.06])。研究结果与所查看的MRI和CT图像及轮廓一致。合格指数仅略有不同; MRI的平均合格指数为77%(3%),CT的平均合格指数为79%(4%)。无论使用哪种成像方式,由于个人喜好引起的轮廓差异仍然可以识别。结论:与CT相比,等高线GBT在MRI的颅外侧和颅内侧方向上的延伸更大。两种成像方式的观察者间差异均相当。观察者应了解现有的个人描述偏好。建议机构审查和讨论目标体积的划分,并在必要时设计补充指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号