首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics >Randomized phase III study comparing Best Supportive Care to Biafine as a prophylactic agent for radiation-induced skin toxicity for women undergoing breast irradiation: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 97-13.
【24h】

Randomized phase III study comparing Best Supportive Care to Biafine as a prophylactic agent for radiation-induced skin toxicity for women undergoing breast irradiation: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 97-13.

机译:随机比较的III期研究比较了最佳支持治疗与比阿芬(Biafine)作为对接受乳房照射的妇女进行辐射诱发的皮肤毒性的预防剂:放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)97-13。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To determine if Biafine compared to Best Supportive Care (BSC) is effective in minimizing or preventing radiation-induced dermatitis in women undergoing breast irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were randomized between Biafine (n = 83) vs. BSC (n = 89). The institutions identified preference for BSC at the time of randomization. A no-treatment arm was allowed (16% received no treatment). Patients were instructed to apply randomized product three times a day, but not within 4 h of their daily RT session. Application began following their first radiation treatment and continued 2 weeks postradiation. Skin dermatitis was scored weekly utilizing the RTOG and ONS (Oncology Nursing Society) skin toxicity scales, a weekly patient satisfaction and quality-of-life questionnaire. RESULTS: Using the RTOG toxicity scale there was no overall difference for maximum dermatitis during RT between Biafine and BSC (p = 0.77). There was no difference in maximum toxicity by arm or breast size. There was an interaction between breast size and toxicity, with large-breasted women exhibiting more toxicity. Large-breasted women receiving Biafine were more likely to have no toxicity 6 weeks post RT. CONCLUSION: There was no overall difference between BSC and Biafine in the prevention, time to, or duration of radiation-induced dermatitis.
机译:目的:确定与最佳支持治疗(BSC)相比,Biafine在减少或预防接受乳房照射的妇女中由辐射引起的皮炎方面是否有效。方法和材料:将患者随机分为Biafine(n = 83)和BSC(n = 89)。这些机构在随机化时确定了对BSC的偏好。允许不进行治疗的手臂(16%不接受治疗)。指导患者每天使用三次随机产品,但不能在每日RT疗程的4小时内使用。在他们的首次放射治疗后开始应用,并在放射后持续2周。每周使用RTOG和ONS(肿瘤护理学会)皮肤毒性量表,每周患者满意度和生活质量调查表对皮肤皮炎进行评分。结果:使用RTOG毒性量表,Biafine和BSC之间在RT期间最大皮炎的总体差异无统计学意义(p = 0.77)。按手臂或乳房大小,最大毒性没有差异。乳房的大小与毒性之间存在相互作用,大排扣的女性表现出更大的毒性。接受Biafine的大排扣妇女在RT后6周更可能没有毒性。结论:BSC和Biafine在放射诱发性皮炎的预防,时间或持续时间方面没有总体差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号