首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics >What is the target volume for preoperative accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI)? In regards to Nichols et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;77:197-202) and Palta et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010, in Press).
【24h】

What is the target volume for preoperative accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI)? In regards to Nichols et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;77:197-202) and Palta et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010, in Press).

机译:术前加速局部乳房照射(APBI)的目标量是多少?关于尼科尔斯等。 (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 77:197-202)和Palta等。 (In J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010,印刷中)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To the Editor: Two recent studies have suggested preoperative accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) as an alternative to conventional, post-lumpectomy APBI (1, 2). We commend the authors' efforts in this potentially important area of research, and we hope the following comments regarding target definition will be considered in future studies. To generate pre- and postoperative clinical target volumes (CTVs) for comparison, both studies used a 15-mm margin to expand both the preoperative gross tumor volume (GTV) and the postoperative surgical cavity. It seems to us that the margin used to expand a preoperative GTV should be larger than that used to expand a lumpectomy cavity. As summarized in a recent publication, a 15-mm tumor bed-to-CTV margin, "is based upon data from mastectomy studies which suggest that 90% of sub-clinical multifocal and multicentric disease lies within 30 mm of the edge of index tumour. If, on average, the index tumour is excised with a margin of around 15 mm, a further 15 mm TB-CTV margin might reasonably be expected to encompass the majority of sub-clinical disease" (3). Whether a 30-mm CTV margin should actually be used for preoperative APBI is open to debate. A recent study suggests, for example, that a smaller margin could be considered for tumors without an extensive in-traductal component (4). Nevertheless, to use the same margin pre- and postoperatively seems arguable.
机译:致编辑:最近的两项研究表明,术前加速部分乳房放疗(APBI)可替代常规的肿块切除术后APBI(1、2)。我们赞扬作者在这一潜在重要研究领域中所做的努力,并希望在未来的研究中考虑以下有关目标定义的评论。为了产生术前和术后的临床目标体积(CTV)进行比较,两项研究均使用15毫米的余量来扩大术前的总肿瘤体积(GTV)和术后的手术腔。在我们看来,用于扩大术前GTV的边缘应大于用于扩大肿块切除术腔的边缘。正如最近发表的出版物所总结的那样,“肿瘤床到CTV的距离为15毫米”,是基于来自乳房切除术研究的数据,该研究表明90%的亚临床多灶性和多中心疾病位于指标肿瘤边缘30毫米内如果平均切除标本肿瘤的边缘约15毫米,则可以合理地预期另外15毫米的TB-CTV边缘将涵盖大部分亚临床疾病”(3)。术前APBI是否应实际使用30毫米CTV边缘尚有争议。例如,最近的一项研究表明,对于没有广泛的导管内成分的肿瘤,可以考虑使用较小的切缘(4)。然而,在手术前后使用相同的余量似乎是有争议的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号