首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Refrigeration >Theoretical comparison of low GWP alternatives for different refrigeration configurations taking R404A as baseline
【24h】

Theoretical comparison of low GWP alternatives for different refrigeration configurations taking R404A as baseline

机译:以R404A为基准的不同制冷配置的低GWP替代品的理论比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Six refrigerants are evaluated as low GWP replacements for R404A using different configurations, including two-stage system architectures. These refrigerants are selected according to similar characteristics to R404A, and they are the mid-term alternatives R407A and R407F, and the long-term alternatives: L40 and DR-7 (with very low GWP and low flammability), N40 and DR-33 (with low GWP and no flammability). In order to have a complete comparison range, various operating conditions are considered, covering low and medium evaporator temperatures and two levels of condensation temperatures. Configurations selected are presented and the equations used to simulate the expected performance are shown. From a given cooling capacity, volumetric flow rate and COP are compared, taking R404A as baseline. The most efficient alternatives are the low-flammable refrigerants, L40 and DR-7, and when no flammability is acceptable, N40 and DR-33 are also very good options.
机译:使用不同的配置(包括两阶段系统架构),对六种制冷剂作为R404A的低GWP替代品进行了评估。根据与R404A相似的特性选择这些制冷剂,它们是中期替代品R407A和R407F,以及长期替代品:L40和DR-7(具有非常低的GWP和低易燃性),N40和DR-33 (具有低全球升温潜能值,并且不易燃)。为了获得一个完整的比较范围,考虑了各种运行条件,包括中低蒸发温度和两个冷凝温度水平。给出了所选的配置,并显示了用于模拟预期性能的方程式。根据给定的制冷量,以R404A为基线,比较体积流量和COP。最有效的替代方法是低易燃制冷剂L40和DR-7,并且在不能接受可燃性的情况下,N40和DR-33也是非常好的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号