...
首页> 外文期刊>British Poultry Science >A commercial trial evaluating three open water sources for farmed ducks: effects on health and production.
【24h】

A commercial trial evaluating three open water sources for farmed ducks: effects on health and production.

机译:一项商业试验,评估了养殖鸭的三种开放水源:对健康和生产的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The present study investigated the effects on Pekin duck health and production of three open water resources in a commercial setting. The three resources were: narrow troughs (15 cm wide and 8 cm deep), intermediate troughs (20 cm wide and 12 cm deep) and wide troughs (50 cm wide and 8 cm deep). A total of 23 flocks of ducks were investigated, with an average size of 4540+or-680 individuals and a final stocking density always under 17 kg/m2. The health of the birds was considered to be of a good standard overall. The only health difference among the resources was that the foot condition of ducks provided with wide troughs was worse than those with intermediate troughs, whilst the foot condition of birds with narrow troughs was intermediate. The open water resources did not differ in their effects on the production measures assessed. Properly managed open water did not have any major negative effects on the health or production of commercial Pekin ducks. Wide, intermediate and narrow troughs did not differ substantially in measures of health or productivity.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2012.736613
机译:本研究调查了在商业环境中对北京烤鸭健康和三种开放水资源的生产的影响。这三种资源是:窄槽(宽15厘米,深8厘米),中间槽(宽20厘米,深12厘米)和宽槽(宽50厘米,深8厘米)。共调查了23只鸭子,平均大小为4540+或-680只,最终饲养密度始终低于17 kg / m 2 。总体而言,鸟类的健康被认为是一个良好的标准。资源之间唯一的健康差异是具有宽槽的鸭子的脚部状况比具有中槽的鸭子的脚部状况差,而具有窄槽的鸟的脚部状况中等。开放水资源对评估的生产措施的影响没有差异。适当管理的开放水不会对商业北京烤鸭的健康或生产产生任何重大不利影响。宽槽,中槽和窄槽在健康或生产力的度量上没有实质性差异。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2012.736613

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号