首页> 外文期刊>British journal of medical & surgical urology >Does the Intercollegiate Specialty Examination in urology (FRCS Urol) assess the breadth of the urology syllabus?
【24h】

Does the Intercollegiate Specialty Examination in urology (FRCS Urol) assess the breadth of the urology syllabus?

机译:大学间泌尿科专业考试(FRCS Urol)是否评估泌尿科教学大纲的广度?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: In January 2007, the Intercollegiate Specialty Board in Urology introduced its new two-part examination in urology (FRCS Urol). The new examination utilised validated tools, underpinned by a precise curriculum for the specialty, which facilitated the knowledge assessment of individuals wishing to gain entry to the Specialist Register for independent practice in urology. This study assesses whether the content of Sections 1 and 2 of the new examination covers the breadth of the ISCP curriculum in urology and secondly whether candidates find the examination acceptable.Methods: The six diets of the examination between January 2007 and November 2009 were studied. The content of the curriculum for urological training was analysed, as were the knowledge domains tested by the examination. Comparisons were made to correlate the effectiveness of the examination in testing various aspects of the syllabus. Subjective exit questionnaires were obtained from candidates sitting both sections of the examination. These were analysed for candidates' views about the organisation of the examinations, its coverage, appropriateness of standard and relevance to clinical practice.Results: There was a high level of concordance between the examination and the content of the curriculum although there was some disparity in the balance of the topics tested which might require fine-tuning. 86% of all candidates returned exit questionnaires with >90% agreeing that the examination was a fair test of knowledge. There was less agreement about the relevance of the MCQ. paper to clinical practice. Conclusion: The post-2006 FRCS (Urol) examination is accepted as a fair test of urologi-cal knowledge by the vast majority of candidates presenting for this assessment. It also fulfils the requirements stipulated by Postgraduate Medical Education Training Board (PMETB) now General Medical Council (GMC) - Postgraduate Board for accreditation of training in the UK and Ireland. The examination ...
机译:简介:2007年1月,大学间泌尿外科专业委员会推出了新的由两部分组成的泌尿外科考试(FRCS Urol)。新考试采用经过验证的工具,并以针对该专科的精确课程为基础,这有助于对希望进入专科泌尿外科独立专科的个人进行知识评估。这项研究评估了新考试的第一和第二部分的内容是否涵盖了ISCP泌尿外科课程的范围,其次是考生是否认为该考试可以接受。方法:研究了2007年1月至2009年11月之间的六种饮食。分析了泌尿外科培训课程的内容,以及考试所测试的知识领域。进行比较以关联考试在测试课程各方面的有效性。从参加考试两个部分的候选人中获得主观退出问卷。对这些内容进行了分析,以了解候选人对考试的组织,覆盖范围,标准的适当性以及与临床实践的相关性的看法。结果:尽管考试之间存在一些差异,但考试与课程内容之间的一致性很高可能需要微调的测试主题之间的平衡。 86%的候选人返回了退出调查表,其中> 90%的人同意该考试是对知识的公平测试。关于MCQ的相关性,人们的共识较少。纸到临床实践。结论:2006年以后的FRCS(尿路)检查被参加该评估的绝大多数候选人接受为尿道学知识的公平测试。它也满足了由研究生医学教育培训委员会(PMETB)现在是通用医学理事会(GMC)-研究生委员会对英国和爱尔兰的培训认证所规定的要求。考试...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号