首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Services and Operations Management >Benchmarking of rapid prototyping systems using grey relational analysis
【24h】

Benchmarking of rapid prototyping systems using grey relational analysis

机译:使用灰色关联分析对快速原型系统进行基准测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this paper, grey relational analysis and fuzzy technique of order preference by a similarity to ideal solution (fuzzy TOPSIS) methods are proposed for selection of rapid prototyping systems considering both benefit and non-benefit criteria. The criteria may be qualitative or quantitative in nature. The results of grey relational analysis are compared with well-known fuzzy TOPSIS method. The advantage of grey theory over fuzzy theory is that grey theory considers the condition of the fuzziness, i.e., grey theory can deal flexibly with the fuzziness situation. Six RP systems are chosen and compared addressing to various criteria such as dimensional accuracy and surface quality, part cost, build time and material properties. Finally, it has been concluded that selective laser sintering (SLS 2500) is the most appropriate RP system for better dimensional accuracy and surface quality whereas 3-D printing (Z 402) is an appropriate RP system for better build time.
机译:本文提出了一种与理想解决方案(模糊TOPSIS)相似的灰色关联分析和阶次偏好的模糊技术,用于同时考虑受益和非受益标准的快速原型系统的选择。该标准本质上可以是定性或定量的。将灰色关联分析的结果与众所周知的模糊TOPSIS方法进行了比较。灰色理论优于模糊理论的优点是,灰色理论考虑了模糊性的条件,即灰色理论可以灵活地处理模糊性情况。选择了六个RP系统,并根据各种标准进行了比较,例如尺寸精度和表面质量,零件成本,制造时间和材料性能。最后,得出的结论是,选择性激光烧结(SLS 2500)是获得更好的尺寸精度和表面质量的最合适的RP系统,而3-D打印(Z 402)是获得更好的构建时间的合适RP系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号