...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of pancreatology: official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology >Biliary and gastric bypass or stenting in nonresectable periampullary cancer: analysis on the basis of controlled trials.
【24h】

Biliary and gastric bypass or stenting in nonresectable periampullary cancer: analysis on the basis of controlled trials.

机译:不可切除的壶腹周围癌的胆,胃搭桥术或支架置入术:在对照试验的基础上进行分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The median survival rate of patients with nonresectable periampullary cancer is not much longer than 6-12 mo. Nevertheless, in most incurable patients palliative treatment is necessary, which has to focus on jaundice, pain, and prevention of gastric outlet obstruction. Up to now, debate remains about how to best provide palliative treatment. METHOD: The results of controlled clinical trials and large multicenter studies comparing operative biliary bypass and biliary stent insertion in nonresectable pancreatic tumors are discussed in this review. RESULTS: The initial success rate in palliation of jaundice is similar after endoscopic stent insertion and biliary bypass operation (range: 90-95 %). Morbidity (range: 1 1-36% vs 26-40%) and 30-d mortality (range: 8-20% vs 15-31%) is higher after bypass operation, whereas stent insertion is accompanied by a higher rate of hospital readmission and reintervention because of recurrent jaundice (range: 28-43%) and a later gastric outlet obstruction (up to 17%). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic biliary stent insertion should be performed if there is evidence of hepatic, peritoneal, or pulmonary metastasis formation, in old patients with a high comorbidity, or if the patient has had several laparotomies. Combined biliary and gastric operative bypass procedures should be performed in nonresectable periampullary carcinomas with accompanying gastric outlet obstruction, in the absence of metastatic spread, if a locally advanced tumor is the only reason for incurability, if exploratory laparotomy demonstrates an unresectable tumor, or if endoscopic treatment fails.
机译:背景:不可切除壶腹周围癌患者的中位生存期不超过6-12 mo。然而,在大多数不治之症患者中,姑息治疗是必需的,它必须侧重于黄疸,疼痛和预防胃出口梗阻。到目前为止,关于如何最好地提供姑息治疗的争论仍在。方法:本综述讨论了对照性临床试验和大型多中心研究的结果,该研究比较了不可切除的胰腺肿瘤中的手术性胆道旁路术和胆道支架置入术。结果:内镜支架置入和胆道搭桥手术后,黄疸减轻的初始成功率相似(范围:90-95%)。搭桥手术后的发病率(范围:1 1-36%vs 26-40%)和30 d死亡率(范围:8-20%vs 15-31%)更高,而支架置入伴随更高的住院率由于复发性黄疸(范围:28-43%)和后来的胃出口梗阻(高达17%)而导致再次入院和再次干预。结论:如果有合并肝,腹膜或肺转移形成的迹象,高合并症的老年患者,或患者有多次开腹手术,则应进行内镜胆道支架置入术。如果不能切除的壶腹周围癌伴有胃出口梗阻,且无转移性扩散,如果局部晚期肿瘤是不能治愈的唯一原因,如果探查性剖腹术显示无法切除的肿瘤,或内镜检查,则应合并胆道和胃旁路手术治疗失败。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号