...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Mechanical Sciences >Edward Gibbon F.R.S.: early historical sciences, Maurist erudition and related scholarship, 17th-20th C
【24h】

Edward Gibbon F.R.S.: early historical sciences, Maurist erudition and related scholarship, 17th-20th C

机译:爱德华·吉本(Edward Gibbon)F.R.S .:早期历史科学,毛利人的博学和相关奖学金,17-20世纪

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Edward Gibbon (1737-1794) prepared over many years to write his classic six-volume history, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. The indisputable quality of his work (at the time) rested first, on his choice of reliable references and second, on the excellence of his English prose. Some elements of the former, when described, have the imprint of natural philosophy or early science for example, the taking of collections of manuscripts and carefully comparing details to establish what is trueor false (or often fabulous) and thus leading to the creation of paleographic science. This kind of procedure led to a great output of Maurist (Benedictine) erudite work through the late 17th and into the early 18th c. A huge academic "industry" developed over the years and gave rise to a large research body of scholars. Relatively little about this Maurist activity is to be found in English language historical writings so here we endeavour to raise the curtain on it for the benefit of scientists-engineers who have come to have an interest in the historical sciences. The works of scholars with different monastical and other backgrounds contemporary with that of the Maurists, which Gibbon made great use of, are referred to. As English historiography seemssomewhat reticent on the topic of Maurist learning, we include a short account of the life and works of Benedictines Mabillon and Montfaucon, and less so, we take note of a score of other erudits such as Muratori, Tillemont, Cluwer, D'Anville and lesswell known scholars.
机译:爱德华·吉本(Edward Gibbon,1737-1794)经过多年准备,准备撰写他的经典六卷历史《罗马帝国的衰落与衰落》。他的作品无可争议的质量(当时)首先取决于他对可靠参考文献的选择,其次取决于英语散文的出色表现。前者的某些元素在被描述时具有自然哲学或早期科学的烙印,例如,收集手稿并仔细比较细节以确定是假的(或常常是神话般的),从而导致古地理的产生科学。这种程序导致了Maurist(本笃十六世)博学工作的大量成果,直到17世纪后期到18世纪初。多年来,巨大的学术“产业”发展起来,并产生了庞大的学者研究机构。在英语的历史著作中很少发现这种毛利主义活动,因此在这里我们努力为对历史科学产生兴趣的科学家和工程师造福。提到了吉本(Gibbon)大量利用的,与修道院主义者不同背景的当代学者作品和与毛利主义者不同的背景。由于英语史学似乎对毛利主义学习这个话题有些沉默寡言,因此我们简要介绍了本尼迪克汀·马比隆和蒙托孔的生平和著作,少之又少,我们注意到许多其他学者,例如Muratori,Tillemont,Cluwer,D '安维尔和鲜为人知的学者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号