首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Radiology >Is carotid duplex scanning sufficient as the sole investigation prior to carotid endarterectomy?
【24h】

Is carotid duplex scanning sufficient as the sole investigation prior to carotid endarterectomy?

机译:在进行颈动脉内膜切除术之前,仅进行颈动脉双工扫描就足够了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the accepted treatment for certain patients who have had, or who are at risk of having, a stroke if they have a significant narrowing of the internal carotid artery. Rapid and accurate classification of the degree of stenosis is important as the benefit of surgery is highly dependent on this. The aim of this study was to assess whether the addition of angiography to duplex scanning resulted in a change in patient management in a unit where duplex scanning was used as the sole imaging investigation prior to CEA. The study population consisted of 64 patients with significant internal carotid artery stenosis on duplex scanning who were suitable for, and wished to be considered for, CEA. All patients underwent an angiogram. In this study 9 (14%) patients did not proceed to surgery on the basis of angiography and in a further 11 (17%) patients insufficient views of the distal vessel were obtained on duplex scanning. Three of these patients had extensive disease which excludedsurgery. One patient experienced a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) at the time of angiography. In conclusion, this audit has highlighted the limitations in performing duplex scanning alone, and the costs that this can incur on the patient who may undergo an unnecessary operation. We cannot recommend duplex scanning as the sole investigation prior to CEA. There is need to evaluate the role of additional non-invasive carotid imaging such as magnetic resonance angiography or CT angiography in the assessment of these patients.
机译:颈内动脉内膜切除术(CEA)对于某些曾经患有中风或如果颈内动脉明显狭窄而有中风风险的患者来说是公认的治疗方法。狭窄程度的快速,准确分类非常重要,因为手术的益处高度依赖于此。这项研究的目的是评估将血管造影术添加至双工扫描是否会导致在将双工扫描用作CEA之前唯一的影像学检查的单位中患者管理的变化。研究人群包括64例在双重扫描下患有严重颈内动脉狭窄的患者,这些患者适合并希望考虑使用CEA。所有患者均接受了血管造影。在这项研究中,有9名(14%)的患者没有根据血管造影进行手术,而在另外11名(17%)的患者中,双侧扫描显示远端血管的视野不足。这些患者中有三例患有广泛疾病,不包括外科手术。一名患者在进行血管造影时经历了短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)。总而言之,该审核突显了仅执行双面扫描的局限性,以及可能给进行不必要手术的患者带来的成本。我们不建议您在CEA之前将双面扫描作为唯一的调查方法。有必要评估其他无创颈动脉成像(如磁共振血管造影或CT血管造影)在评估这些患者中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号