首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Radiology >The low energy X-ray response of the LiF:Mg:Cu:P thermoluminescent dosemeter: a comparison with LiF:Mg:Ti.
【24h】

The low energy X-ray response of the LiF:Mg:Cu:P thermoluminescent dosemeter: a comparison with LiF:Mg:Ti.

机译:LiF:Mg:Cu:P热发光剂量计的低能X射线响应:与LiF:Mg:Ti的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

LiF:Mg:Cu:P thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLD) can be used for the same X-ray dosimetry applications as LiF:Mg:Ti, with each type having the disadvantage of a response dependent on energy, particularly at low energies. Measurements were made of the response per unit air kerma of LiF:Mg:Cu:P and LiF:Mg:Ti to nine quasi-monoenergetic X-ray beams with mean energies from 12 keV to 208 keV. Each measurement was normalized to the value produced by 6 MV X-rays. LiF:Mg:Cu:P was found to under-respond to a majority of these radiations whereas LiF:Mg:Ti over-responded to a majority. Their smallest relative measured response was produced by the lowest energy beam, and the maximum measured relative response of 1.15+/-0.07 and 1.21+/-0.07 for LiF:Mg:Cu:P and LiF:Mg:Ti, respectively, occurred at 33 keV. Energy response coefficients were derived from these measurements to estimate the error introduced by using either type of TLD to measure the dose from an X-ray spectrum different to that used for its absolute response calibration. It was calculated that if the response of either type of TLD was calibrated at 100 kVp, then an error of no more than +/-2% would be introduced into measurements of tube output at potentials of 50-130 kVp. LiF:Mg:Cu:P was found to introduce a larger error (up to 30%) into the measurement of body exit dose than LiF:Mg:Ti at tube potentials of 40-150 kVp, if its absolute response was calibrated using the corresponding body entrance beam. The method should allow this type of error to be estimated in other dosimetry applications for either type of TLD.
机译:LiF:Mg:Cu:P热发光剂量仪(TLD)可用于与LiF:Mg:Ti相同的X射线剂量测定应用,每种类型的缺点都是响应取决于能量,特别是在低能量时。测量了LiF:Mg:Cu:P和LiF:Mg:Ti的每单位空气比释动能对9个准单能X射线束的响应,平均能量为12 keV至208 keV。每次测量均归一化为6 MV X射线产生的值。发现LiF:Mg:Cu:P对大多数辐射反应不足,而LiF:Mg:Ti对大多数辐射反应不足。它们的最小相对测量响应是由最低能量束产生的,LiF:Mg:Cu:P和LiF:Mg:Ti的最大测量相对响应分别为1.15 +/- 0.07和1.21 +/- 0.07 33 keV。从这些测量中得出能量响应系数,以估算通过使用任一类型的TLD从X射线光谱测量剂量(其绝对响应校准所使用的剂量不同)而引入的误差。据计算,如果将两种类型的TLD的响应都校准为100 kVp,则在电势为50-130 kVp的情况下,对灯管输出的测量将引入不超过+/- 2%的误差。如果LiF:Mg:Cu:P的绝对响应已通过校准,则在管电势为40-150 kVp时,会比LiF:Mg:Ti引入更大的误差(高达30%)。相应的身体入口光束。对于其他类型的TLD,该方法应允许在其他剂量测定应用中估计此类错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号