...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cardiology >Evaluation of neointimal coverage and apposition with various drug-eluting stents over 12 months after implantation by optical coherence tomography
【24h】

Evaluation of neointimal coverage and apposition with various drug-eluting stents over 12 months after implantation by optical coherence tomography

机译:光学相干断层扫描评估植入后12个月内各种药物洗脱支架对新内膜的覆盖和附着情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an imaging technology with high resolution which provides new opportunities for evaluating the vascular healing reaction after stent implantation. We used OCT to compare neointimal coverage and stent strut apposition with different types of drug-eluting stent (DES) at more than 12 months follow-up. Methods: Fifty five patients who accepted 72 DESs (19 sirolimus-eluting stents [SES, Cypher Select], 27 paclitaxel-eluting stents [PES, Taxus Liberte], 26 zotarolimus-eluting stents [ZES, Endeavor]) were enrolled in our study. OCT was performed at 12-18 months after stent implantation. The neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) thickness and stent strut apposition at 1-mm interval and the presence of thrombus in each stent were observed. Results: The average NIH thickness (0.1806 ?? 0.1726 mm in SES vs. 0.2558 ?? 0.2187 mm in PES vs. 0.2983 ?? 0.2567 mm in ZES, p < 0.001) and percentage of NIH area (17.21 ?? 14.05% in SES vs. 23.09 ?? 14.53% in PES vs. 28.73 ?? 20.47% in ZES, p = 0.002) were significantly greater in ZES than in other DESs. The prevalence of uncovered struts (8.96% in SES vs. 6.19% in PES vs. 2.98% in ZES, p < 0.01) and malapposed struts (6.36% in SES vs. 2.32% in PES vs. 1.69% in ZES, p < 0.01) was significantly lower in ZES than in other DESs. Thrombus was less frequently observed in ZES than in other DESs (SES 1.70% vs. PES 0.83% vs. ZES 0.17%, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Compared with SES and PES, ZES showed lower prevalence of uncovered struts and malapposed struts at more than 12 months follow-up.
机译:背景:光学相干断层扫描(OCT)是一种高分辨率的成像技术,为评估支架植入后的血管愈合反应提供了新的机会。在超过12个月的随访中,我们使用OCT比较了不同类型的药物洗脱支架(DES)的新内膜覆盖率和支架撑杆并置情况。方法:本研究纳入了接受72 DES治疗的55例患者(19例西罗莫司洗脱支架[SES,Cypher Select],27例紫杉醇洗脱支架[PES,Taxus Liberte],26例佐他莫司洗脱支架[ZES,Endeavor]。 。在支架植入后12-18个月进行OCT。观察到新内膜增生(NIH)厚度和支架撑杆并列间隔为1 mm,并且每个支架中都存在血栓。结果:平均NIH厚度(SES为0.1806≤0.1726 mm,PES为0.2558≤0.2187 mm,ZES为0.2983≤0.2567 mm,p <0.001)和NIH面积百分比(SES为17.21≤14.05%)与PES中的23.09%相比,PES中的14.53%相对于ZES中的28.73%≤20.47%,p = 0.002)在ZES中显着高于其他DES。未覆盖的支撑杆的患病率(SES为8.96%,PES为6.19%,ZES为2.98%,p <0.01)和贴壁不良的患病率(SES为6.36%,PES为2.32%对ZES为1.69%,p < ZES中的0.01)显着低于其他DES中的0.01。与其他DES相比,在ZES中观察到血栓的频率更低(SES 1.70%vs. PES 0.83%vs. ZES 0.17%,p <0.01)。结论:与SES和PES相比,ZES在超过12个月的随访中显示出未发现的支柱和不良的支柱的患病率较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号