首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cardiology >Incorporating Glomerular filtration rate or creatinine clearance by the modification of diet in renal disease equation or the Cockcroft-Gault equations to improve the Global Accuracy of the Age, Creatinine, Ejection Fraction [ACEF] score in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
【24h】

Incorporating Glomerular filtration rate or creatinine clearance by the modification of diet in renal disease equation or the Cockcroft-Gault equations to improve the Global Accuracy of the Age, Creatinine, Ejection Fraction [ACEF] score in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

机译:通过修改肾脏疾病方程式或Cockcroft-Gault方程式中的饮食来合并肾小球滤过率或肌酐清除率,以提高接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者的年龄,肌酐,射血分数[ACEF]评分的整体准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The aim of the present study was to appraise the comparative ability of different ACEF models incorporating glomerular filtration rate or creatinine clearance estimated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [ACEFMDRD] or Cokcroft-Gault [ACEFCG] equations, respectively, over the original ACEF score (ACEFSrCr) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: A total of 537 patients were analyzed by different measures of discrimination, calibration and net reclassification improvement (NRI). Results: A significant gradient in all-cause mortality was consistently seen with all the models at 30 days, 1 year and 5 years. The comparison of the three models showed that the best balance in terms of discrimination and calibration for all-cause mortality was offered by the ACEFCG at 30 days, the ACEFMDRD at 1 year and similarly by the ACEFCG and ACEFMDRD at 5 years. At 30 days, the NRI was + 32.9% for ACEFMDRD over ACEFSrCr and + 16% for ACEFCG over ACEFSrCr. At 1 year, the NRI was 13.8% for ACEFMDRD over ACEFSrCr and - 7.8% for ACEF CG over ACEFSrCr. At 5 years, the NRI was + 7.7% for both the ACEFMDRD and the ACEFCG over the ACEFSrCr. Conclusions: In patients undergoing PCI, the ACEF score is associated with satisfactory early-, mid- and long-term discrimination regardless of the definition of renal function. However, incorporating glomerular filtration rate or creatinine clearance by the MDRD or CG formulas in the ACEF score yields superior calibration compared with the original SrCr-based equation, with the ACEFMDRD displaying superior reclassification ability over the ACEFCG and ACEFSrCr at 30 days and 1 year.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是评估不同ACEF模型的肾小球滤过率或肌酐清除率的比较能力,这些模型分别通过饮食中肾脏疾病饮食[ACEFMDRD]或Cokcroft-Gault [ACEFCG]方程估算。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者的ACEF原始评分(ACEFSrCr)。方法:采用区分,校正和净重分类改善(NRI)的不同方法对537例患者进行了分析。结果:在所有模型中,在30天,1年和5年时,所有原因的死亡率均出现了显着的梯度。三种模型的比较表明,在全因死亡率的区分和校正方面,ACECFG在30天,ACEFMDRD在1年,ACEFCG和ACEFMDRD在5年时达到了最佳平衡。在30天时,ACEFMDRD较ACEFSrCr的NRI为+ 32.9%,ACECFG较ACEFSrCr的NRI为+ 16%。在1年时,ACEFMDRD的ACE较ACEFSrCr的NRI为13.8%,ACEF CG的ACERrCr的NRI为7.8%。在5年时,ACEFMDRD和ACEFCG的NRI比ACEFSrCr高出7.7%。结论:在接受PCI的患者中,ACEF评分与令人满意的早期,中期和长期歧视相关,而与肾功能的定义无关。然而,与原始的基于SrCr的方程式相比,通过MDRD或CG公式将肾小球滤过率或肌酐清除率纳入ACEF评分可产生更好的校准,并且ACEFMDRD在30天和1年时显示出比ACEFCG和ACEFSrCr更好的重分类能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号