...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cardiology >Effects of cardiac contractility modulation by non-excitatory electrical stimulation on exercise capacity and quality of life: An individual patient's data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Effects of cardiac contractility modulation by non-excitatory electrical stimulation on exercise capacity and quality of life: An individual patient's data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:非兴奋性电刺激调节心脏收缩力对运动能力和生活质量的影响:随机对照试验的单个患者数据荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Although cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) has emerged as a promising device treatment for heart failure (HF), the effect of CCM on functional capacity and quality of life has not been the subject of an individual patient data meta-analysis to determine its effect on measures of functional capacity and life quality. This meta-analysis is aimed at systematically reviewing the latest available randomized evidence on the effectiveness of CCM on functional capacity and quality of life indexes in patients with HF. Methods The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched in May 2013 to identify eligible randomized controlled trials comparing CCM with sham treatment or usual care. Primary outcomes of interest were peak oxygen consumption, 6-minute walk test distance and quality of life measured by Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire. There was no sufficient information to address safety. Mean difference and 95% confidence intervals (C.I.s) were calculated for continuous data using a fixed-effects model. Results Three studies enrolling 641 participants were identified and included. Pooled analysis showed that, compared to control, CCM significantly improved peak oxygen consumption (mean difference + 0.71, 95% C.I. 0.20 to 1.21 mL/kg/min, p = 0.006), 6-minute walk test distance (mean difference + 13.92, 95% C.I. - 0.08 to 27.91 m, p = 0.05) and quality of life measured by Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (mean difference - 7.17, 95% C.I. - 10.38 to - 3.96, p < 0.0001). Conclusions Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials suggests that CCM has significant if somewhat modest benefits in improving measures of functional capacity and quality of life.
机译:背景技术尽管心脏收缩调节(CCM)已成为一种有希望的治疗心力衰竭(HF)的设备,但是CCM对功能能力和生活质量的影响尚未成为单个患者数据荟萃分析确定其影响的主题关于功能能力和生活质量的度量。这项荟萃分析旨在系统地复查关于CCM对HF患者的功能能力和生活质量指标的有效性的最新可用随机证据。方法2013年5月,对Cochrane对照试验中心注册资料库MEDLINE和EMBASE进行了检索,以鉴定符合条件的随机对照试验,以比较CCM与假治疗或常规护理。感兴趣的主要结果是峰值耗氧量,6分钟步行测试距离和明尼苏达州心衰患者生活质量调查表所测量的生活质量。没有足够的信息来解决安全问题。使用固定效应模型计算连续数据的均值差和95%置信区间(C.I.s)。结果确定并纳入了641名参与者的三项研究。汇总分析显示,与对照组相比,CCM显着改善了峰值耗氧量(平均差异+ 0.71,95%CI 0.20至1.21 mL / kg / min,p = 0.006),步行6分钟的步行测试距离(平均差异+ 13.92, 95%CI-0.08至27.91 m,p = 0.05)和生活质量由明尼苏达州心衰患者问卷调查(平均差异-7.17,95%CI-10.38至-3.96,p <0.0001)。结论对来自随机试验的单个患者数据进行的荟萃分析表明,CCM在改善功能能力和生活质量的衡量指标方面具有显着的好处,即使有一点适度的好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号