...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cardiology >Enzymatic activity of DPIV and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) proteases in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and primary prevention implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD)
【24h】

Enzymatic activity of DPIV and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) proteases in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and primary prevention implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD)

机译:DPIV和肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)蛋白酶对患有左心功能不全和一级预防性植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的患者的酶活性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Patients (pts) with severely decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF ≤ 35%) are at high risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD). We sought to investigate, if pts with primary prevention ICD hold alterations in enzyme-activities of the dipeptidyl-aminopeptidase IV (DPIV) and the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) before VT/VF occurrence. Methods: 57 Pts (53 male, mean age 64.9 [42-84] years, mean LV-EF 26 ± 5%) with ischemic (n = 49) or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 8) who had received an ICD/CRT-D for primary prevention, were included. Pts were assessed for appropriate ICD intervention for VT/VF during a mean follow-up of 365 ± 90 days. Serum levels of dipeptidyl-aminopeptidase IV (DPIV), aminopeptidase N (APN), aminopeptidase B (APB), insulin-regulated aminopeptidase (IRAP), and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) were determined. Results: Pts with appropriate ICD intervention (n = 16) had higher serum activities of IRAP (mean difference = 12.681 pkat/mL; p = 0.007), and DPIV (mean difference = 117.557 pkat/mL; p = 0.032) than pts without appropriate ICD intervention. Furthermore, ACE2 activity was significantly higher (median: 223.7 RFU/s mL vs. 169.10 RFU/s mL; p = 0.037). A Cox regression analysis indicated DPIV activity > 50th centile to have a hazard ratio (HR) of 5.955 (CI 95%: 1.670-21.241; p = 0.006) for prediction of appropriate ICD intervention. In a multivariate Cox regression model, DPIV and IRAP > 50th centile remained predictive for appropriate ICD intervention. Conclusion: Our prospective study shows that pts with primary prevention ICD, who receive appropriate ICD intervention during follow-up, can be identified by elevated activities of DPIV and several RAS proteases. Hence, theses biomarkers seem to be of prognostic relevance in a primary prevention collective. Our data has to be proven in larger cohorts.
机译:背景:左室射血分数严重降低(LV-EF≤35%)的患者(pts)有心源性猝死(SCD)的高风险。我们试图调查在发生VT / VF之前,是否具有一级预防性ICD的pts持有二肽基-氨基肽酶IV(DPIV)和肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)的酶活性变化。方法:接受ICD / IC治疗的57分(53岁,平均年龄64.9 [42-84]岁,平均LV-EF 26±5%)伴缺血性(n = 49)或非缺血性心肌病(n = 8)。包括用于一级预防的CRT-D。在365±90天的平均随访中,对Pt进行了适当的ICD VT / VF介入治疗评估。测定了血清二肽基-氨基肽酶IV(DPIV),氨基肽酶N(APN),氨基肽酶B(APB),胰岛素调节性氨基肽酶(IRAP)和血管紧张素转换酶2(ACE2)的水平。结果:经过适当的ICD干预(n = 16)的患者的IRAP血清活性(平均差异= 12.681 pkat / mL; p = 0.007)和DPIV(平均差异= 117.557 pkat / mL; p = 0.032)高于无精神分裂症的患者适当的ICD干预。此外,ACE2活性明显更高(中位数:223.7 RFU / s mL与169.10 RFU / s mL; p = 0.037)。 Cox回归分析表明,DPIV活性> 50%时,其危险比(HR)为5.955(CI 95%:1.670-21.241; p = 0.006),用于预测适当的ICD干预。在多变量Cox回归模型中,对于适当的ICD干预,DPIV和IRAP> 50%仍可预测。结论:我们的前瞻性研究表明,在随访期间接受适当ICD干预的一级预防性ICD的患者可以通过DPIV和几种RAS蛋白酶活性的升高来鉴定。因此,这些生物标志物在一级预防人群中似乎与预后相关。我们的数据必须在更大的队列中得到证明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号