首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cardiology >Avoiding bias in measuring 'hemisphere radius' in echocardiographic mitral regurgitation quantification: Mona Lisa PISA
【24h】

Avoiding bias in measuring 'hemisphere radius' in echocardiographic mitral regurgitation quantification: Mona Lisa PISA

机译:超声心动图二尖瓣关闭不全量化中避免在测量“半球半径”时出现偏差:Mona Lisa PISA

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The conventional "Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area" (PISA) technique is the standard clinical method to quantify the effective regur-gitant orifice area (EROA) in mitral regurgitation (MR) [1-4]. Using conventional PISA, the operator must measure the distance r ("radius") between the flow convergence zone and the orifice. Traditionally the teaching is that the radius should be measured perpendicularly to the valve plane. In the 4 chamber-view this is typically vertical, towards the probe. However in some cases the valve plane unavoidably has a different orientation and operators may not be sure whether to measure (as advised) or towards the probe. Lack of guidance on this question is compounded by the assumption that the distance to the aliasing point in the two directions should be roughly the same so that the choice does not matter. We tested these experimentally to remove doubt.
机译:传统的“近端等速表面积”(PISA)技术是量化二尖瓣反流(MR)中有效反流口面积(EROA)的标准临床方法[1-4]。使用传统的PISA,操作员必须测量流量会聚区和孔口之间的距离r(“半径”)。传统上,教导是半径应垂直于阀平面进行测量。在四腔视图中,这通常是垂直于探头的。但是,在某些情况下,阀平面不可避免地会具有不同的方向,并且操作员可能不确定是要测量(建议)还是朝向探头。假设在两个方向上到锯齿点的距离应该大致相同,这样的选择就没有关系了,对此问题缺乏指导。我们通过实验测试了这些,以消除疑问。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号