首页> 外文期刊>British journal of ophthalmology >Single versus sequential testing with scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser, IOLMaster and anterior segment optical coherence tomography for the detection of narrow angles.
【24h】

Single versus sequential testing with scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser, IOLMaster and anterior segment optical coherence tomography for the detection of narrow angles.

机译:使用扫描周边前房深度分析仪,IOLMaster和前节光学相干断层扫描进行单次或顺序测试,以检测窄角度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser (SPAC), IOLMaster and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) are devices that can screen non-invasively for narrow angles (NAs) and may reduce the need for gonioscopy, especially where the availability of ophthalmologists is limited. When used individually to detect NAs, neither SPAC, AS-OCT nor IOLMaster were able to achieve both high sensitivity and specificity when using gonioscopy as a gold standard. AIMS: To assess whether sequential testing improves discrimination of NAs over single testing. METHODS: In a prospective community-based cross-sectional study in Singapore, 2047 phakic right eyes underwent SPAC, IOLMaster and AS-OCT. NA eyes were defined as present when Shaffer scores were 0 or 1 in >/= 2 quadrants on gonioscopy. Sensitivities and specificities of single and sequential testing were compared. RESULTS: At a fixed specificity of 95%, sensitivities in detecting NA eyes were 57.8% (95% CI 52.7% to 62.7%) for SPAC, 43.3% (95% CI 38.3% to 48.3%) for IOLMaster and 52.1% (95% CI 46.4% to 57.7%) for AS-OCT. After sequential testing using SPAC followed by AS-OCT, the sensitivity rose to 70.3% (95% CI 65.5% to 74.8%) while specificity remained at 94.3% (95% CI 93.1% to 95.4%), with sensitivity significantly higher than single testing alone (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Sequential testing significantly improves the accuracy of detecting NAs and may be useful in screening settings.
机译:背景技术:扫描外围前房深度分析仪(SPAC),IOLMaster和前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)是可以无创地筛查狭窄角度(NA)的设备,并且可以减少对角膜镜检查的需求,尤其是在可获得的情况下眼科医生的数量有限。当单独使用来检测NA时,将角膜镜检查法作为金标准,SPAC,AS-OCT和IOLMaster都无法同时实现高灵敏度和特异性。目的:评估顺序测试是否比单项测试改善了NA的区分度。方法:在新加坡进行的一项基于社区的前瞻性横断面研究中,对2047眼有晶状体右眼进行了SPAC,IOLMaster和AS-OCT。在角膜镜检查中,当Shaffer评分在> / = 2象限中为0或1时,将NA眼定义为存在。比较了单个和顺序测试的敏感性和特异性。结果:在95%的固定特异性下,SPAC检测NA眼的敏感性分别为57.8%(95%CI 52.7%至62.7%),IOLMaster为43.3%(95%CI 38.3%至48.3%)和52.1%(95) AS-OCT的百分比CI为46.4%至57.7%)。在先后使用SPAC和AS-OCT进行顺序测试后,灵敏度提高到70.3%(95%CI从65.5%到74.8%),而特异性保持在94.3%(95%CI从93.1%到95.4%),灵敏度明显高于单个单独测试(p <0.001)。结论:顺序检测显着提高了NA的检测准确性,可能对筛查设置有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号