首页> 外文期刊>British journal of ophthalmology >Inter- and intraobserver variation in the analysis of optic disc images: comparison of the Heidelberg retina tomograph and computer assisted planimetry.
【24h】

Inter- and intraobserver variation in the analysis of optic disc images: comparison of the Heidelberg retina tomograph and computer assisted planimetry.

机译:观察者之间和观察者内部对光盘图像分析的差异:海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪和计算机辅助平面测量的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AIMS: The development of imaging and measurement techniques has brought the prospect of greater objectivity in the measurement of optic disc features, and therefore better agreement between observers. The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the variation between observers using two measurement devices. METHODS: Optic disc photographs and images from the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT) of 30 eyes of 30 subjects were presented to six observers for analysis, and to one observer on five separate occasions. Agreement between observers was studied by comparing the analysis of each observer with the median result of the other five, and expressed as the mean difference and standard deviation of differences between the observer and the median. Inter- and intraobserver variation was calculated as a coefficient of variation (mean SD/mean x 100). RESULTS: For planimetry, agreement between observers was dependent on observer experience, for the HRT it was independent. Agreement between observers (SD of differences as a percentage of the median) for optic disc area was 4.0% to 7.2% (planimetry) and 3.3% to 6.0% (HRT), for neuroretinal rim area it was 10.8% to 21.0% (planimetry) and 5.2% to 9.6% (HRT). The mean interobserver coefficient of variation for optic disc area was 8.1% (planimetry) and 4.4% (HRT), for neuroretinal rim area it was 16.3% (planimetry) and 8.1% (HRT), and (HRT only) for rim volume was 16.3%, and reference height 9.1%. HRT variability was greater for the software version 1.11 reference plane than for version 1.10. The intraobserver coefficient of variation for optic disc area was 1.5% (planimetry) and 2.4% (HRT), for neuroretinal rim area it was 4.0% (planimetry) and 4.5% (HRT). CONCLUSIONS: Variation between observers is greatly reduced by the HRT when compared with planimetry. However, levels of variation, which may be clinically significant, remain for variables that depend on the subjective drawing of the disc margin.
机译:目的:成像和测量技术的发展带来了在测量光盘特征方面具有更大客观性的前景,从而使观察者之间达成了更好的协议。这项研究的目的是量化和比较使用两个测量设备的观察者之间的差异。方法:将海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪(HRT)的30名受试者的30只眼睛的光盘照片和图像呈现给六位观察者进行分析,并分别向五位观察者进行分析。通过将每个观察者的分析与其他五个观察者的中位数结果进行比较,研究了观察者之间的一致性,并表示为观察者与中位数之间的均值差和标准差。观察者之间和观察者内部的变化被计算为变化系数(平均SD /平均x 100)。结果:对于平面测量,观察者之间的协议取决于观察者的经验,而对于HRT,它是独立的。视盘区域的观察者之间的一致性(差异的SD为中位数的百分比)为4.0%至7.2%(平面测量)和3.3%至6.0%(HRT),而神经视网膜边缘区域为10.8%至21.0%(平面测量) )和5.2%至9.6%(HRT)。视盘区域的平均观察者间变异系数为8.1%(平面测量)和4.4%(HRT),神经视网膜边缘区域的平均观察者变异系数为16.3%(平面测量)和8.1%(HRT),并且(仅HRT)边缘体积为16.3%,参考身高9.1%。软件1.11版参考平面的HRT变异性大于1.10版。视盘内观察者的视盘区域变异系数为1.5%(平面法)和2.4%(HRT),而神经视网膜边缘区域的观察者变异系数为4.0%(平面法)和4.5%(HRT)。结论:与平面测量法相比,HRT大大减少了观察者之间的差异。但是,对于那些取决于椎间盘边缘的主观图纸的变量,变化水平可能仍然具有临床意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号