...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cardiology >Comprehensive analysis of intravascular ultrasound and angiographic morphology of culprit lesions between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
【24h】

Comprehensive analysis of intravascular ultrasound and angiographic morphology of culprit lesions between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

机译:ST段抬高型心肌梗死与非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征的元凶病变血管内超声和血管造影形态学分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Some plaques lead to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), whereas others cause non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). We used angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to investigate the difference of culprit lesion morphologies in ACS. Methods Consecutive 158 ACS patients whose culprit lesions were imaged by preintervention IVUS were enrolled (STEMI = 81; NSTEACS = 77). IVUS and angiographic findings of the culprit lesions, and clinical characteristics were compared between the groups. Results There were no significant differences in patients' characteristics except for lower rate of statin use in patients with STEMI (20% vs 44%, p = 0.001). Although angiographic complex culprit morphology (Ambrose classification) and thrombus were more common in STEMI than in NSTEACS (84% vs 62%, p = 0.002; 51% vs 5%, p 0.0001, respectively), SYNTAX score was lower in STEMI (8.6 ± 5.4 vs 11.5 ± 7.1, p = 0.01). In patients with STEMI, culprit echogenicity was more hypoechoic (64% vs 40%, p = 0.01), and the incidence of plaque rupture, attenuation and " microcalcification" were significantly higher (56% vs 17%, p 0.0001; 85% vs 69%, p = 0.01; 77% vs 61%, p = 0.04, respectively). Furthermore, the maximum area of ruptured cavity, echolucent zone and arc of microcalcification were significantly greater in STEMI compared with NSTEACS (1.80 ± 0.99 mm2 vs 1.13 ± 0.86 mm2, p = 0.006; 1.52 ± 0.74 mm2 vs 1.21 ± 0.81 mm2, p = 0.004; 99.9 ± 54.6 vs 77.4 ± 51.2, p = 0.01, respectively). Quantitative IVUS analysis showed that vessel and plaque area were significantly larger at minimum lumen area site (16.6 ± 5.4 mm2 vs 14.2 ± 5.5 mm 2, p = 0.003; 13.9 ± 5.1 mm2 vs 11.6 ± 5.2 mm2, p = 0.003, respectively). Conclusion Morphological feature (outward vessel remodeling, plaque buildup and IVUS vulnerability of culprit lesions) might relate to clinical presentation in patients with ACS.
机译:背景一些斑块导致ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI),而其他斑块则引起非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTEACS)。我们使用血管造影和血管内超声(IVUS)来研究ACS的罪魁祸首形态。方法纳入158例ACS患者,他们的病灶均由介入前IVUS成像(STEMI = 81; NSTEACS = 77)。比较两组的IVUS和血管造影结果,并比较临床特征。结果除了STEMI患者使用他汀类药物的比例较低(20%vs 44%,p = 0.001)外,患者的特征无显着差异。尽管STEMI的血管造影复杂元凶形态(Ambrose分类)和血栓比NSTEACS更常见(分别为84%vs 62%,p = 0.002; 51%vs 5%,p <0.0001),但SYNTAX评分在STEMI中较低( 8.6±5.4与11.5±7.1,p = 0.01)。在STEMI患者中,罪魁祸首的回声性较低(64%vs 40%,p = 0.01),斑块破裂,衰减和“微钙化”的发生率明显更高(56%vs 17%,p <0.0001; 85%) vs 69%,p = 0.01; 77%vs 61%,p = 0.04)。此外,与NSTEACS相比,STEMI中STEMI的最大破裂腔,回声区和微钙化弧明显更大(1.80±0.99 mm2 vs 1.13±0.86 mm2,p = 0.006; 1.52±0.74 mm2 vs 1.21±0.81 mm2,p = 0.004; 99.9±54.6与77.4±51.2,p = 0.01)。 IVUS定量分析显示,在最小管腔面积部位,血管和斑块面积明显更大(分别为16.6±5.4 mm2 vs 14.2±5.5 mm 2,p = 0.003; 13.9±5.1 mm2 vs 11.6±5.2 mm2,p = 0.003)。结论ACS患者的形态特征(外血管重塑,斑块积聚和IVUS易受侵害)可能与临床表现有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号