...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of geriatric psychiatry >A preliminary investigation of the reliability and validity of the Brief Assessment Schedule Depression Cards and the Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen to screen for depression in older stroke survivors.
【24h】

A preliminary investigation of the reliability and validity of the Brief Assessment Schedule Depression Cards and the Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen to screen for depression in older stroke survivors.

机译:对简短评估时间表抑郁卡和贝克抑郁量表-快速筛查筛查老年中风幸存者抑郁症的可靠性和有效性进行了初步调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To conduct an initial assessment of the reliability and validity of the Brief Assessment Schedule Depression Cards (BASDEC) and the Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS) to screen for depression in older stroke survivors. METHODS: Participants from four inpatient rehabilitation units completed the BASDEC and the BDI-FS together with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for comparison. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis 1 Disorders (SCID) was then completed with all participants to ascertain a criterion depression diagnosis. The BASDEC and BDI-FS were subsequently completed for a second time. RESULTS: Forty-nine stroke survivors (M=78.80, SD=6.79 years) were included. The BASDEC and BDI-FS demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The BASDEC (cut-off >or=7) resulted in a sensitivity of 1.0 and specificity of 0.95 for detecting major depression whereas the BDI-FS (cut-off >or=4) had a sensitivity of 0.71 and specificity of 0.74. When participants with minor depression were included in analyses, sensitivity lowered to 0.69 (specificity=0.97) for the BASDEC and 0.62 (specificity=0.78) for the BDI-FS. CONCLUSIONS: The BASDEC and BDI-FS were found to have acceptable reliability. The BASDEC demonstrated some advantage in criterion validity over the BDI-FS at the examined cut-offs.
机译:目的:对简短评估时间表抑郁卡(BASDEC)和贝克抑郁快速调查表(BDI-FS)的可靠性和有效性进行初步评估,以筛查中风幸存者中的抑郁症。方法:来自四个住院康复科的参与者完成了BASDEC和BDI-FS以及医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)进行比较。然后,所有参与者完成了针对DSM-IV轴1疾病(SCID)的结构化临床访谈,以确定标准的抑郁症诊断。 BASDEC和BDI-FS随后第二次完成。结果:包括49名卒中幸存者(M = 78.80,SD = 6.79岁)。 BASDEC和BDI-FS表现出可接受的内部一致性和重测可靠性。 BASDEC(临界值≥7)的灵敏度为1.0,特异性为0.95;而BDI-FS临界值≥4的灵敏度为0.71,特异性为0.74。当分析中包括轻度抑郁的参与者时,BASDEC的敏感性降低至0.69(特异性= 0.97),而BDI-FS的敏感性降低至0.62(特异性= 0.78)。结论:发现BASDEC和BDI-FS具有可接受的可靠性。在检查的临界值上,BASDEC在标准有效性方面显示出优于BDI-FS的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号