首页> 外文期刊>British journal of ophthalmology >Re: 'Prospective randomized comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation'.
【24h】

Re: 'Prospective randomized comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation'.

机译:回复:“有或没有硅胶插管的外部泪囊鼻腔吻合术的前瞻性随机比较”。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We read with interest "Prospective randomised comparison of external dacryocysto-rhinostomy with and without silicone intubation" by Saiju it al The investigators should be congratulated on their effort in performing a prospective clinical trial to address this important question. There are, however, issues that we believe limit the ability to draw definitive conclusions from their study. First, we have concerns about the randomisation process at the time of surgery scheduling that resulted in unbalanced treatment groups because of early withdrawal. This process of patient self-selection can result in unidentified differences between treatment groups that may have affected their results.
机译:我们饶有兴趣地阅读了Saiju等人的“有或没有进行硅胶插管的外部泪囊鼻-鼻造口术的预期随机比较”。应该祝贺研究人员为进行前瞻性临床试验以解决这一重要问题。但是,我们认为有些问题限制了他们从研究中得出明确结论的能力。首先,我们担心手术安排时的随机化过程会由于早期退出而导致治疗组不平衡。患者自我选择的过程可能导致治疗组之间的不确定差异,可能影响其结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号