...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cardiology >Impact of short-term mechanical circulatory support with extracorporeal devices on postoperative outcomes after emergency heart transplantation: Data from a multi-institutional Spanish cohort
【24h】

Impact of short-term mechanical circulatory support with extracorporeal devices on postoperative outcomes after emergency heart transplantation: Data from a multi-institutional Spanish cohort

机译:短期机械循环支持与体外设备对紧急心脏移植术后术后结局的影响:来自多机构西班牙队列的数据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives We sought to investigate the potential impact of preoperative short-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with extracorporeal devices on postoperative outcomes after emergency heart transplantation (HT). Methods We conducted an observational study of 669 patients who underwent emergency HT in 15 Spanish hospitals between 2000 and 2009. Postoperative outcomes of patients bridged to HT on short-term MCS (n = 101) were compared with those of the rest of the cohort (n = 568). Short-term MCS included veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenators (VA-ECMOs, n = 23), and both pulsatile-flow (n = 53) and continuous-flow (n = 25) extracorporeal ventricular assist devices (VADs). No patient underwent HT on intracorporeal VADs. Results Preoperative short-term MCS was independently associated with increased in-hospital postoperative mortality (adjusted odds-ratio 1.75, 95% CI 1.05-2.91) and overall post-transplant mortality (adjusted hazard-ratio 1.60, 95% CI 1.15-2.23). Rates of major surgical bleeding, cardiac reoperation, postoperative infection and primary graft failure were also significantly higher among MCS patients. Causes of death and survival after hospital discharge were similar in MCS and non-MCS candidates. Increased risk of post-transplant mortality affected patients bridged on pulsatile-flow extracorporeal VADs (adjusted hazard-ratio 2.21, 95% CI 1.48-3.30) and continuous-flow extracorporeal VADs (adjusted hazard-ratio 2.24, 95% CI 1.20-4.19), but not those bridged on VA-ECMO (adjusted hazard-ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.21-1.25). Conclusions Patients bridged to emergency HT on short-term MCS are exposed to an increased risk of postoperative complications and mortality. In our series, preoperative bridging with VA-ECMO resulted in comparable post-transplant outcomes to those of patients transplanted on conventional support.
机译:目的我们试图调查术前短期机械循环支持(MCS)和体外装置对紧急心脏移植(HT)后术后结果的潜在影响。方法我们对2000年至2009年间在西班牙15所医院接受急诊HT的669例患者进行了观察性研究。将短期MCS桥接HT的患者(n = 101)的术后结局与其余队列的患者进行了比较( n = 568)。短期MCS包括静脉-动脉体外膜充氧器(VA-ECMO,n = 23),以及脉动流(n = 53)和连续流(n = 25)体外心室辅助装置(VAD)。没有患者在体内VAD上接受HT。结果术前短期MCS与院内术后死亡率增加(校正后的比值比为1.75,95%CI 1.05-2.91)和总体移植后死亡率(校正后的危险比值为1.60,95%CI为1.15-2.23)相关。 。 MCS患者的主要外科手术出血,心脏再手术,术后感染和原发性移植失败的发生率也显着更高。 MCS和非MCS候选人的出院后死亡和生存原因相似。受脉动血流体外VADs(调整后的危险比2.21,95%CI 1.48-3.30)和连续血流体外VADs(调整过的危险比2.24,95%CI 1.20-4.19)桥接了受影响的患者,增加了移植后死亡率的风险,但不是桥接在VA-ECMO上的那些(调整后的危险比0.51,95%CI 0.21-1.25)。结论短期MCS桥接急诊HT的患者术后并发症和死亡风险增加。在我们的系列研究中,术前使用VA-ECMO桥接导致的移植后结局与常规支持下移植的患者相当。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号