首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control >Comparison of CO2 capture economics for iron and steel mills
【24h】

Comparison of CO2 capture economics for iron and steel mills

机译:钢铁厂二氧化碳捕集经济性的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

One of the largest energy consuming manufacturing industries in the world is the iron and steel industry which emits almost 5% of the total world CO2 emissions. Previous studies examining the application of CO2 capture at iron and steel mills evaluated capture at conventional and Corex iron and steel mills. This study extends the analysis to include Hismelt, Midrex and the mini mill. In the first part of our study, we present a high level scoping assessment of the opportunities for implementing CO2 capture at existing direct atmospheric CO2 emission points. Implementing CO2 capture using commercial MEA solvent at a conventional iron and steel mill costs from A$ 80 to A$ 250 per tonne of CO2 avoided. Estimated costs to capture from the existing point sources at the Hismelt and Corex iron and steel mills also range from A$ 80 to A$ 250 per tonne of CO2 avoided. At a direct reduction iron process such as Midrex, the cost of CO2 capture from the process stack gas is estimated at about A$ 90 per tonne of CO2 avoided. A cost of approximately A$ 110 to A$ 130 per tonne of CO2 avoided is estimated to capture from the EAF unit of the steel production route for the Midrex and mini mill processes. Alternatively, CO2 can also be captured where it is produced from processes such as the blast furnace or reduction vessel. Although these streams contain a high level of CO2, they are used as a low-grade fuel throughout the plant and the produced CO2 is vented elsewhere. This study also estimates the cost of capturing the CO2 before further combustion and venting. The costs are estimated for the conventional iron and steel mill blast furnace, the top gas recycling blast furnace (TGRBF), Hismelt and Corex reduction vessel gases. Capture using MEA solvent absorption, the costs range from A$ 65 to almost A$ 80 per tonne CO2 avoided. Using Vacuum Pressure Swing Adsorption technology in place of MEA solvent absorption, the capture costs for these gases reduce by approximately 25-40%
机译:钢铁行业是世界上最大的能源消耗制造业之一,其排放量几乎占世界CO2排放总量的5%。先前研究在钢铁厂中应用CO2捕集的研究评估了传统工厂和Corex钢铁厂的捕集。这项研究将分析范围扩大到包括Hismelt,Midrex和小型轧机。在研究的第一部分中,我们对在现有直接大气CO2排放点实施CO2捕集的机会进行了高水平的范围评估。在传统的钢铁厂中使用商业MEA溶剂进行二氧化碳捕集的成本为每吨二氧化碳减少80澳元至250澳元。从Hismelt和Corex钢铁厂的现有点源中捕获的估计成本也为每吨CO2减少80至250澳元。在直接还原铁工艺(如Midrex)中,从工艺烟道气中捕集CO2的成本估计约为每吨CO2避免90澳元。估计从Midrex和小型轧机工艺的钢铁生产路线的EAF装置中获得的每吨CO2成本约为110至130澳元。或者,在高炉或还原炉等过程中产生的二氧化碳也可以被捕获。尽管这些物流包含高水平的CO2,但它们在整个工厂中用作低级燃料,并且所产生的CO2被排放到其他地方。这项研究还估计了在进一步燃烧和排放之前捕获二氧化碳的成本。估计费用包括常规钢铁厂高炉,顶部气体再循环高炉(TGRBF),Hismelt和Corex还原容器气体。使用MEA溶剂吸收进行捕集,每吨二氧化碳的成本从65澳元到几乎80澳元不等。使用真空变压吸附技术代替MEA溶剂吸收,这些气体的捕集成本降低了约25-40%

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号