...
首页> 外文期刊>British journal of nursing: BJN >Mentorship: Do the returns justify the investment?
【24h】

Mentorship: Do the returns justify the investment?

机译:指导:回报证明投资合理吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Mentorship programmes are one of the biggest continuing professional development costs for NHS placement providers. The number of mentors undertaking approved mentorship programmes run into the tens of thousands across the UK each year. Add to this the cost of releasing staff to attend the course and then attend annual face-to-face updates, maintenance of a live register of mentors, the undertaking of triennial reviews, enabling 1 hour per week protected time for sign-off mentors and the overall time taken by mentors in supporting learners in practice. The investment in mentorship is significant.Any business investing that much time and money into what are significant numbers of mentors would expect a substantial return on their investment, not least nurses who are committed to mentorship and providing high-quality learning for the future workforce. Unfortunately there are significant flaws in the system that militates against this.
机译:对于NHS安置提供者来说,指导计划是最大的持续专业发展成本之一。每年,在英国范围内,进行批准的指导计划的导师人数达到数以万计。再加上释放人员参加课程,然后参加年度面对面更新,维护导师的实时登记册,进行三年期审核的成本,为签核导师和顾问提供每周1个小时的保护时间,以及导师在实践中支持学习者所花费的总时间。导师制方面的投资是巨大的。任何将大量时间和金钱投入到大量导师制中的企业,都有望获得可观的投资回报,尤其是致力于导师制和为未来员工提供高质量学习的护士。不幸的是,系统中存在严重的缺陷,可以抵制此问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号