...
首页> 外文期刊>Haematologica >Deferasirox, deferiprone and desferrioxamine treatment in thalassemia major patients: cardiac iron and function comparison determined by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.
【24h】

Deferasirox, deferiprone and desferrioxamine treatment in thalassemia major patients: cardiac iron and function comparison determined by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.

机译:地拉罗、去铁酮和去铁胺治疗地中海贫血重症患者:通过定量磁共振成像确定心脏铁和功能比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Oral deferiprone was suggested to be more effective than subcutaneous desferrioxamine for removing heart iron. Oral once-daily chelator deferasirox has recently been made commercially available but its long-term efficacy on cardiac iron and function has not yet been established. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of deferasirox, deferiprone and desferrioxamine on myocardial and liver iron concentrations and bi-ventricular function in thalassemia major patients by means of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. DESIGN AND METHODS: From the first 550 thalassemia subjects enrolled in the Myocardial Iron Overload in Thalassemia network, we retrospectively selected thalassemia major patients who had been receiving one chelator alone for longer than one year. We identified three groups of patients: 24 treated with deferasirox, 42 treated with deferiprone and 89 treated with desferrioxamine. Myocardial iron concentrations were measured by T2* multislice multiecho technique. Biventricular function parameters were quantitatively evaluated by cine images. Liver iron concentrations were measured by T2* multiecho technique. RESULTS: The global heart T2* value was significantly higher in the deferiprone (34 +/- 11 ms) than in the deferasirox (21 +/- 12 ms) and the desferrioxamine groups (27 +/- 11 ms) (P = 0.0001). We found higher left ventricular ejection fractions in the deferiprone and the desferrioxamine versus the deferasirox group (P = 0.010). Liver iron concentration, measured as T2* signal, was significantly lower in the desferrioxamine versus the deferiprone and the deferasirox group (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The cohort of patients treated with oral deferiprone showed less myocardial iron burden and better global systolic ventricular function compared to the patients treated with oral deferasirox or subcutaneous desferrioxamine.
机译:背景:口服去铁酮被认为比皮下注射去铁胺在去除心脏铁方面更有效。口服每日一次的螯合剂地拉罗司最近已上市,但其对心脏铁和功能的长期疗效尚未确定。本研究旨在通过定量磁共振成像比较地拉罗、去铁酮和去铁胺对地中海贫血重症患者心肌和肝脏铁浓度以及双心室功能的有效性。设计和方法: 从地中海贫血网络心肌铁超负荷网络中招募的前 550 名地中海贫血受试者中,我们回顾性地选择了单独接受一种螯合剂治疗超过一年的地中海贫血重症患者。我们确定了三组患者:24 例接受地拉罗酮治疗,42 例接受去铁酮治疗,89 例接受去铁胺治疗。通过 T2* 多层多回波技术测量心肌铁浓度。通过电影图像定量评估双心室功能参数。通过T2*多回波技术测量肝铁浓度。结果:去铁酮组 (34 +/- 11 ms) 的整体心脏 T2* 值显着高于地拉罗司组 (21 +/- 12 ms) 和去铁胺组 (27 +/- 11 ms) (P = 0.0001)。我们发现去铁酮组和去铁胺组的左心室射血分数高于地拉罗司组(P = 0.010)。与去铁酮组和地拉罗司组相比,去铁胺组的肝铁浓度(以 T2* 信号测量)显着降低 (P = 0.004)。结论:与口服地拉罗司或皮下注射去铁胺治疗的患者相比,口服去铁酮治疗的患者队列表现出更低的心肌铁负荷和更好的整体收缩心室功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号