首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society >Comparison of CMIP3 and CMIP5 projected hydrologic conditions over the Upper Colorado River Basin
【24h】

Comparison of CMIP3 and CMIP5 projected hydrologic conditions over the Upper Colorado River Basin

机译:科罗拉多河上游流域CMIP3和CMIP5预估水文条件的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This work presents updated hydrologic projections for the Upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB) using downscaled (approximately 12 km) General Circulation Model (GCM) output from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project - Phase 5 (CMIP5) with a comparison to CMIP3 GCMs. We use the Soil and Water Assessment Tool model to simulate the impacts of end-of-century climate change on the UCRB using 21 CMIP5 and 18 CMIP3 GCMs, collected into one CMIP5 ensemble and one CMIP3 ensemble, respectively. Previous CMIP3 studies have identified a drier climate for the UCRB because of projected increases in temperature and decreases/little change in precipitation. Hydrologic simulations from CMIP5 inputs suggest wetter conditions than simulations based on CMIP3 inputs, yet drier conditions than the historical climate. Both ensembles lead to timing shifts in peak streamflow during the snowmelt season from changes in snowmelt, but the higher CMIP5 projected precipitation leads to, on average, peak streamflows 200-300 m(3) s(-1) larger (25-40% difference) than the CMIP3 projections. This difference is largely generated in the northern UCRB region, where CMIP5 simulations project much more significant increases in streamflow than CMIP3. This increase is largely due to an overall larger rise in precipitation in the CMIP5 ensemble (57% of the total UCRB area) compared to the CMIP3 ensemble (5%). Even with projected increases in precipitation, snowmelt is projected to decrease dramatically throughout the UCRB for both ensembles. The increases in precipitation and decreases in snowmelt leads to significant differences in hydrologic flux components between the CMIP3 and CMIP5 ensembles, such as end-of-century rises in soil water content and evapotranspiration in the CMIP5 ensemble compared to the CMIP3 ensemble. The difference between the dry CMIP3 and the somewhat wetter CMIP5 projections may be critical for water management in the already over-allocated UCRB.
机译:这项工作使用了耦合模型比较项目-阶段5(CMIP5)的缩小规模(约12公里)的一般环流模型(GCM),并与CMIP3 GCM进行了比较,提出了上科罗拉多河盆地(UCRB)的最新水文预测。我们使用土壤和水评估工具模型,分别使用21个CMIP5和18个CMIP3 GCM来模拟世纪末气候变化对UCRB的影响,分别收集到1个CMIP5和1个CMIP3中。先前的CMIP3研究已经确定了UCRB较干燥的气候,因为预计温度会升高,而降水的减少/变化很小。与基于CMIP3输入的模拟相比,来自CMIP5输入的水文模拟显示较湿的条件,但比历史气候更干燥。这两个集合都导致融雪季节中融雪季节的峰值水流发生时间偏移,但是较高的CMIP5预计降水会导致平均峰值水流增加200-300 m(3)s(-1)(25-40%差异)。这种差异主要是在北部的UCRB地区产生的,在该地区,CMIP5模拟比CMIP3预测流量显着增加。这种增加主要是由于与CMIP3系综(5%)相比,CMIP5系综降水总体增加幅度更大(占UCRB总面积的57%)。即使预计降雨量增加,两个集合的整个UCRB的融雪预计也会急剧减少。降雨的增加和融雪的减少导致CMIP3和CMIP5集合之间水文通量分量的显着差异,例如与CMIP3集合相比,世纪末土壤水含量的上升和CMIP5集合中的蒸散作用。在已经超额分配的UCRB中,干燥的CMIP3和稍微潮湿的CMIP5预测之间的差异可能对水资源管理至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号